Efficacy and Outcomes of Intrathecal Analgesia as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Colon and Rectal Surgical Patients.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2018-03-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8174579
Amit Merchea, Jenna K Lovely, Adam K Jacob, Dorin T Colibaseanu, Scott R Kelley, Kellie L Mathis, Grant M Spears, Marianne Huebner, David W Larson
{"title":"Efficacy and Outcomes of Intrathecal Analgesia as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Colon and Rectal Surgical Patients.","authors":"Amit Merchea,&nbsp;Jenna K Lovely,&nbsp;Adam K Jacob,&nbsp;Dorin T Colibaseanu,&nbsp;Scott R Kelley,&nbsp;Kellie L Mathis,&nbsp;Grant M Spears,&nbsp;Marianne Huebner,&nbsp;David W Larson","doi":"10.1155/2018/8174579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multimodal analgesia is an essential component of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). An ERP that includes the use of single-injection intrathecal analgesia (IA) has been shown to decrease morbidity and cost and shorten length of stay (LOS). Limited data exist on safety, feasibility, and the optimal IA regimen. Our objective was to characterize the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of IA within an ERP in a cohort of colorectal surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent open or minimally invasive colorectal surgery from October 2012 to December 2013. All patients were enrolled in an institutional ERP that included the use of single-injection IA. Demographics, anesthetic management, efficacy (pain scores and opiate consumption), postoperative ileus (POI), adverse effects, and LOS are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>601 patients were identified. The majority received opioid-only IA (91%) rather than a multimodal regimen. Median LOS was 3 days. Overall rate of ileus was 16%. Median pain scores at 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours were 3, 2, 3, 4, and 3, respectively. There was no difference in postoperative pain scores, LOS, or POI based on intrathecal medication or dose received. Overall, development of respiratory depression (0.2%) or pruritus (1.2%) was rare. One patient required blood patch for postdural headache.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intrathecal analgesia is safe, feasible, and efficacious in the setting of ERP for colorectal surgery. All regimens and doses achieved a short LOS, low pain scores, and a low incidence of POI. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03411109.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2018 ","pages":"8174579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8174579","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8174579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose: Multimodal analgesia is an essential component of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). An ERP that includes the use of single-injection intrathecal analgesia (IA) has been shown to decrease morbidity and cost and shorten length of stay (LOS). Limited data exist on safety, feasibility, and the optimal IA regimen. Our objective was to characterize the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of IA within an ERP in a cohort of colorectal surgical patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent open or minimally invasive colorectal surgery from October 2012 to December 2013. All patients were enrolled in an institutional ERP that included the use of single-injection IA. Demographics, anesthetic management, efficacy (pain scores and opiate consumption), postoperative ileus (POI), adverse effects, and LOS are reported.

Results: 601 patients were identified. The majority received opioid-only IA (91%) rather than a multimodal regimen. Median LOS was 3 days. Overall rate of ileus was 16%. Median pain scores at 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours were 3, 2, 3, 4, and 3, respectively. There was no difference in postoperative pain scores, LOS, or POI based on intrathecal medication or dose received. Overall, development of respiratory depression (0.2%) or pruritus (1.2%) was rare. One patient required blood patch for postdural headache.

Conclusion: Intrathecal analgesia is safe, feasible, and efficacious in the setting of ERP for colorectal surgery. All regimens and doses achieved a short LOS, low pain scores, and a low incidence of POI. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrails.gov NCT03411109.

鞘内镇痛作为结肠和直肠手术患者增强恢复途径的一部分的疗效和结果。
目的:多模态镇痛是增强恢复通路(ERP)的重要组成部分。包括使用单次鞘内镇痛(IA)在内的ERP已被证明可以降低发病率和成本并缩短住院时间(LOS)。关于安全性、可行性和最佳IA方案的数据有限。我们的目的是在一组结直肠手术患者的ERP中描述IA的有效性、安全性和可行性。方法:我们对2012年10月至2013年12月连续接受开放或微创结直肠手术的所有年龄≥18岁的患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者都纳入了包括使用单次注射IA的机构ERP。报告了人口统计学、麻醉管理、疗效(疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗)、术后肠梗阻(POI)、不良反应和LOS。结果:共发现601例患者。大多数患者只接受阿片类药物注射(91%),而不是多模式治疗方案。平均生存期为3天。肠梗阻的总发生率为16%。4、8、16、24、48小时疼痛评分中位数分别为3、2、3、4、3。术后疼痛评分、LOS或POI基于鞘内药物或剂量没有差异。总体而言,发生呼吸抑制(0.2%)或瘙痒(1.2%)的情况很少见。1例患者因硬脊膜后头痛需要补血。结论:鞘内镇痛是安全、可行、有效的。所有方案和剂量均达到了较短的LOS、较低的疼痛评分和较低的POI发生率。该试验已在Clinicaltrails.gov注册NCT03411109。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信