Adult pulmonary intralobar sequestrations: changes in the surgical management.

Journal of visualized surgery Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13
Akram Traibi, Agathe Seguin-Givelet, Emmanuel Brian, Madalina Grigoroiu, Dominique Gossot
{"title":"Adult pulmonary intralobar sequestrations: changes in the surgical management.","authors":"Akram Traibi,&nbsp;Agathe Seguin-Givelet,&nbsp;Emmanuel Brian,&nbsp;Madalina Grigoroiu,&nbsp;Dominique Gossot","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Until now, the traditional procedure to treat intralobar pulmonary sequestration (ILS) in adults has been a lobectomy performed by open chest surgery. We have reviewed our data to determine whether the surgical management of these lesions has evolved over the last years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were operated on for an ILS by either posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT group), or by thoracoscopy (TS group) between 2000 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients were operated on for a ILS during this period. Before 2011, all resections were performed by thoracotomy (n=6) and after 2011 the approach was either a thoracotomy (n=5) or a thoracoscopy (n=7). There was one conversion because of dense pleural adhesions and this patient was integrated in the PLT group for further analysis. ILS presented more frequently on the left side (n=12, 66.7%) than on the right one (n=6, 33.3%) and exclusively in the lower lobes. All the PLT group patients underwent a lobectomy. In the TS group, five patients underwent a sublobar resection (2 segmentectomies S9+10, 1 basilar segmentectomy and 2 atypical resections). There was no mortality. In the PLT group, 5 patients (45%) had complications versus one patient (14%) in the TS group. The mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the PLT group versus 5.4 days in the TS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data confirm that ILS can be safely treated by a sublobar resection that should be performed, whenever possible, without opening the chest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of visualized surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Until now, the traditional procedure to treat intralobar pulmonary sequestration (ILS) in adults has been a lobectomy performed by open chest surgery. We have reviewed our data to determine whether the surgical management of these lesions has evolved over the last years.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who were operated on for an ILS by either posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT group), or by thoracoscopy (TS group) between 2000 and 2016.

Results: Eighteen patients were operated on for a ILS during this period. Before 2011, all resections were performed by thoracotomy (n=6) and after 2011 the approach was either a thoracotomy (n=5) or a thoracoscopy (n=7). There was one conversion because of dense pleural adhesions and this patient was integrated in the PLT group for further analysis. ILS presented more frequently on the left side (n=12, 66.7%) than on the right one (n=6, 33.3%) and exclusively in the lower lobes. All the PLT group patients underwent a lobectomy. In the TS group, five patients underwent a sublobar resection (2 segmentectomies S9+10, 1 basilar segmentectomy and 2 atypical resections). There was no mortality. In the PLT group, 5 patients (45%) had complications versus one patient (14%) in the TS group. The mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the PLT group versus 5.4 days in the TS group.

Conclusions: These data confirm that ILS can be safely treated by a sublobar resection that should be performed, whenever possible, without opening the chest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

成人肺瓣内隔离:手术处理的改变。
背景:到目前为止,治疗成人肺叶内肺隔离(ILS)的传统方法是通过开胸手术进行肺叶切除术。我们回顾了我们的数据,以确定这些病变的手术治疗是否在过去几年中发生了变化。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2000年至2016年间通过后外侧开胸术(PLT组)或胸腔镜(TS组)进行ILS手术的患者记录。结果:本组共18例患者行ILS手术。2011年之前,所有手术均采用开胸手术(n=6), 2011年之后,手术入路为开胸手术(n=5)或胸腔镜手术(n=7)。由于致密的胸膜粘连,有一例转换,该患者被纳入PLT组进行进一步分析。ILS多发于左侧(n=12, 66.7%),多发于右侧(n=6, 33.3%),且多发于下叶。所有PLT组患者均行肺叶切除术。在TS组中,5例患者接受了叶下切除术(2例S9+10节段切除术,1例基底节段切除术和2例非典型切除术)。没有死亡。在PLT组中,5名患者(45%)出现并发症,而TS组中有1名患者(14%)出现并发症。PLT组的平均住院时间为7.4天,而TS组为5.4天。结论:这些数据证实,只要可能,在不开胸的情况下,行叶下切除术可以安全地治疗ILS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信