Validation of Chromatographic Methods of Analysis: Application for Drugs That Derived From Herbs.

Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Gunawan Indrayanto
{"title":"Validation of Chromatographic Methods of Analysis: Application for Drugs That Derived From Herbs.","authors":"Gunawan Indrayanto","doi":"10.1016/bs.podrm.2018.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well known that the quality control (QC) of drugs derived from herbs (DDHs) has two main problems: first, DDHs are chemically complex mixtures, and second, the chemical contents of raw plant materials are affected by the site of cultivation, age of plants, methods of harvesting, and processing. QC is used by manufacturers to ensure the consistency, safety, and efficacy of the DDHs. QC of DDHs can be performed by two approaches, namely, marker-oriented and chemical pattern-oriented (metabolite profiling) using chromatographic methods. For having reliable results of any chemical analysis that will be performed in the QC laboratory, the method of analysis must be validated first before it can be routinely applied. Parameters of the validation method that should be evaluated for marker-oriented approach are stability, selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, and robustness/ruggedness, while for metabolite profiling approach stability, intra- and interday precisions should be determined. Determination of instrumental and sample detection limit (DL), quantification limit (QL), and cutoff value is described in this review. Some relatively new validation methods that could correlate trueness and precision will be also discussed. The importance and application of metabolite profiling for a QC laboratory at pharmaceutical industry are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20802,"journal":{"name":"Profiles of drug substances, excipients, and related methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/bs.podrm.2018.01.003","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profiles of drug substances, excipients, and related methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.podrm.2018.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

It is well known that the quality control (QC) of drugs derived from herbs (DDHs) has two main problems: first, DDHs are chemically complex mixtures, and second, the chemical contents of raw plant materials are affected by the site of cultivation, age of plants, methods of harvesting, and processing. QC is used by manufacturers to ensure the consistency, safety, and efficacy of the DDHs. QC of DDHs can be performed by two approaches, namely, marker-oriented and chemical pattern-oriented (metabolite profiling) using chromatographic methods. For having reliable results of any chemical analysis that will be performed in the QC laboratory, the method of analysis must be validated first before it can be routinely applied. Parameters of the validation method that should be evaluated for marker-oriented approach are stability, selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, and robustness/ruggedness, while for metabolite profiling approach stability, intra- and interday precisions should be determined. Determination of instrumental and sample detection limit (DL), quantification limit (QL), and cutoff value is described in this review. Some relatively new validation methods that could correlate trueness and precision will be also discussed. The importance and application of metabolite profiling for a QC laboratory at pharmaceutical industry are discussed.

色谱分析方法的验证:中草药成分的应用。
众所周知,草药衍生药物(DDHs)的质量控制(QC)主要存在两个问题:第一,DDHs是化学复杂的混合物,第二,植物原料的化学含量受种植地点、植物年龄、收获方法和加工的影响。生产商使用QC来确保ddh的一致性、安全性和有效性。DDHs的质量控制可以通过两种方法进行,即标记导向和化学模式导向(代谢物分析)使用色谱方法。为了在QC实验室进行的任何化学分析获得可靠的结果,分析方法必须在常规应用之前首先进行验证。对于面向标记的方法,应评估验证方法的参数是稳定性、选择性、线性、真实性、精密度和鲁棒性/坚固性,而对于代谢物谱分析方法的稳定性,应确定日内和日内精密度。本综述描述了仪器和样品检测限(DL)、定量限(QL)和截止值的确定。本文还讨论了一些比较新的验证方法,这些方法可以将正确度和精确度联系起来。讨论了代谢物谱分析在制药工业QC实验室中的重要性和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Profiles of drug substances, excipients, and related methodology
Profiles of drug substances, excipients, and related methodology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信