Are Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotics Required in Routine Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Q1 Medicine
Joints Pub Date : 2018-03-13 eCollection Date: 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1636950
Njalalle Baraza, Jordan Leith
{"title":"Are Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotics Required in Routine Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery? A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Njalalle Baraza,&nbsp;Jordan Leith","doi":"10.1055/s-0038-1636950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The purpose of this study was to find out from the literature the difference in infection rates between patients who did and patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. <b>Methods</b>  We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature using Medline Ovid for prospective studies that looked at infection as the primary outcome following shoulder arthroscopy. The articles were then assessed for study design, outcome, and relevance to the specific question as part of the critical appraisal. <b>Results</b>  Eight partially relevant articles were obtained from the search, but there were no prospective studies comparing infection in patients who had prophylactic antibiotics versus those who did not in shoulder arthroscopy. <b>Conclusion</b>  No compelling evidence exists on the role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infections in shoulder arthroscopy. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"6 1","pages":"54-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0038-1636950","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose  The purpose of this study was to find out from the literature the difference in infection rates between patients who did and patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Methods  We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature using Medline Ovid for prospective studies that looked at infection as the primary outcome following shoulder arthroscopy. The articles were then assessed for study design, outcome, and relevance to the specific question as part of the critical appraisal. Results  Eight partially relevant articles were obtained from the search, but there were no prospective studies comparing infection in patients who had prophylactic antibiotics versus those who did not in shoulder arthroscopy. Conclusion  No compelling evidence exists on the role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infections in shoulder arthroscopy. Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Abstract Image

常规肩关节镜手术是否需要预防性静脉注射抗生素?文献系统综述。
目的本研究的目的是从文献中了解关节镜肩关节手术中接受预防性抗生素治疗和未接受预防性抗生素治疗的患者感染率的差异。方法:我们使用Medline Ovid对前瞻性研究进行了全面的文献检索,这些研究将感染作为肩关节镜检查后的主要结果。然后对文章的研究设计、结果和与特定问题的相关性进行评估,作为批判性评估的一部分。结果从检索中获得了8篇部分相关的文章,但没有前瞻性研究比较肩关节镜检查中预防性抗生素患者与未预防性抗生素患者的感染情况。结论预防性抗生素在肩关节镜检查中预防感染的作用尚无令人信服的证据。证据等级IV级,对IV级研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信