Occipital and Cingulate Hypometabolism are Significantly Under-Reported on 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans of Patients with Lewy Body Dementia.

Moath Hamed, Frank Schraml, Jeffrey Wilson, James Galvin, Marwan N Sabbagh
{"title":"Occipital and Cingulate Hypometabolism are Significantly Under-Reported on 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans of Patients with Lewy Body Dementia.","authors":"Moath Hamed,&nbsp;Frank Schraml,&nbsp;Jeffrey Wilson,&nbsp;James Galvin,&nbsp;Marwan N Sabbagh","doi":"10.4172/2161-0460.1000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether occipital and cingulate hypometabolism is being under-reported or missed on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) CT scans in patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have reported higher sensitivity and specificity for occipital and cingulate hypometabolism on FDG-PET of DLB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review looked at regions of interest (ROI's) in FDG-PET CT scan reports in 35 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of probable, possible, or definite DLB as defined by the latest DLB Consortium Report. ROI's consisting of glucose hypometabolism in frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and cingulate areas were tabulated and charted separately by the authors from the reports. A blinded Nuclear medicine physician read the images independently and marked ROI's separately. A Cohen's Kappa coefficient statistic was calculated to determine agreement between the reports and the blinded reads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the radiology reports, 25.71% and 17.14% of patients reported occipital and cingulate hypometabolism respectively. Independent reads demonstrated significant disagreement with the proportion of occipital and cingulate hypometabolism being reported on initial reads: 91.43% and 85.71% respectively. Cohen's Kappa statistic determinations demonstrated significant agreement only with parietal hypometabolism (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occipital and cingulate hypometabolism is under-reported and missed frequently on clinical interpretations of FDG-PET scans of patients with DLB, but the frequency of hypometabolism is even higher than previously reported. Further studies with more statistical power and receiver operating characteristic analyses are needed to delineate the sensitivity and specificity of these <i>in vivo</i> biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease & Parkinsonism","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0460.1000428","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease & Parkinsonism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0460.1000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether occipital and cingulate hypometabolism is being under-reported or missed on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) CT scans in patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB).

Background: Recent studies have reported higher sensitivity and specificity for occipital and cingulate hypometabolism on FDG-PET of DLB patients.

Methods: This retrospective chart review looked at regions of interest (ROI's) in FDG-PET CT scan reports in 35 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of probable, possible, or definite DLB as defined by the latest DLB Consortium Report. ROI's consisting of glucose hypometabolism in frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and cingulate areas were tabulated and charted separately by the authors from the reports. A blinded Nuclear medicine physician read the images independently and marked ROI's separately. A Cohen's Kappa coefficient statistic was calculated to determine agreement between the reports and the blinded reads.

Results: On the radiology reports, 25.71% and 17.14% of patients reported occipital and cingulate hypometabolism respectively. Independent reads demonstrated significant disagreement with the proportion of occipital and cingulate hypometabolism being reported on initial reads: 91.43% and 85.71% respectively. Cohen's Kappa statistic determinations demonstrated significant agreement only with parietal hypometabolism (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Occipital and cingulate hypometabolism is under-reported and missed frequently on clinical interpretations of FDG-PET scans of patients with DLB, but the frequency of hypometabolism is even higher than previously reported. Further studies with more statistical power and receiver operating characteristic analyses are needed to delineate the sensitivity and specificity of these in vivo biomarkers.

Abstract Image

在路易体痴呆患者的18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描中,枕部和扣带代谢低下的报道明显不足。
目的:探讨18-氟氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)对路易体痴呆(DLB)患者枕带和扣带低代谢是否漏报或漏报。背景:最近的研究报道了FDG-PET对DLB患者枕部和扣带代谢低下具有更高的敏感性和特异性。方法:本回顾性图表回顾了35例连续临床诊断为可能、可能或明确的DLB患者的FDG-PET CT扫描报告中的感兴趣区域(ROI’s),这些患者的诊断由最新的DLB联盟报告定义。由额叶、顶叶、颞叶、枕叶和扣带区葡萄糖代谢低下组成的ROI分别由报告中的作者制成表格和图表。一名盲眼核医学医生独立阅读图像并分别标记ROI。计算Cohen's Kappa系数统计来确定报告与盲法读数之间的一致性。结果:在影像学报告中,25.71%的患者报告枕部代谢低下,17.14%的患者报告扣带代谢低下。独立读数与初始读数报告的枕部和扣带代谢低下比例存在显著差异:分别为91.43%和85.71%。结论:枕叶和扣带低代谢在DLB患者FDG-PET扫描的临床解释中经常被低估和遗漏,但低代谢的频率甚至高于先前报道。进一步的研究需要更多的统计能力和接受者工作特征分析来描述这些体内生物标志物的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信