International needs analysis in orthopaedic trauma for practising surgeons with a 3-year review of resulting actions.

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2017-11-15 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2017.1398555
Richard Buckley, Peter Brink, Kodi Kojima, Wa'el Taha, Donald Moore, Mike Cunningham
{"title":"International needs analysis in orthopaedic trauma for practising surgeons with a 3-year review of resulting actions.","authors":"Richard Buckley, Peter Brink, Kodi Kojima, Wa'el Taha, Donald Moore, Mike Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2017.1398555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: To ensure best-quality education in orthopaedic trauma, the AOTrauma Education Commission conducted a Global Needs Analysis with practising surgeons worldwide. <b>Material and methods</b>: During July to November 2012, an email invitation to complete an online set of 30 questions in eight languages was sent to our members and associates in all countries through AOTrauma's regional networks. Non-members were invited to participate through collaboration with orthopaedic societies. <b>Results</b>: A total of 3,790 surgeons practising orthopaedic trauma (49%), orthopaedic (15%), general trauma (15%) and specialty orthopaedic (13%) surgeons responded worldwide. Seventy per cent completed all questions, and the top 10 countries accounted for half the responses. The top 3 areas of educational need were orthopaedic trauma, joint replacement and preservation, and pelvis and acetabulum. Aspects influencing likelihood to attend face-to-face courses were: expert faculty, focus on a specific topic, clear objectives, and discussion and feedback from experts. Barriers to attending courses were time away from practice, cost and lack of availability or access. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Global Needs Analysis helped our educational committees to identify short- and mid-term priorities over recent years. Adjustments in our planning have helped meet the needs of our audience on a global, regional and national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"6 1","pages":"1398555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2017.1398555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To ensure best-quality education in orthopaedic trauma, the AOTrauma Education Commission conducted a Global Needs Analysis with practising surgeons worldwide. Material and methods: During July to November 2012, an email invitation to complete an online set of 30 questions in eight languages was sent to our members and associates in all countries through AOTrauma's regional networks. Non-members were invited to participate through collaboration with orthopaedic societies. Results: A total of 3,790 surgeons practising orthopaedic trauma (49%), orthopaedic (15%), general trauma (15%) and specialty orthopaedic (13%) surgeons responded worldwide. Seventy per cent completed all questions, and the top 10 countries accounted for half the responses. The top 3 areas of educational need were orthopaedic trauma, joint replacement and preservation, and pelvis and acetabulum. Aspects influencing likelihood to attend face-to-face courses were: expert faculty, focus on a specific topic, clear objectives, and discussion and feedback from experts. Barriers to attending courses were time away from practice, cost and lack of availability or access. Conclusion: The Global Needs Analysis helped our educational committees to identify short- and mid-term priorities over recent years. Adjustments in our planning have helped meet the needs of our audience on a global, regional and national level.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对执业外科医生进行国际创伤骨科需求分析,并对由此采取的行动进行 3 年期审查。
简介:为确保创伤骨科教育的最佳质量,创伤骨科教育委员会与世界各地的执业外科医生进行了全球需求分析。材料与方法:在 2012 年 7 月至 11 月期间,我们通过 AOTrauma 的地区网络向所有国家的会员和合作者发送了电子邮件邀请函,请他们用八种语言在线填写 30 个问题。通过与骨科协会合作,邀请非会员参与。结果:全球共有 3,790 名从事创伤骨科(49%)、骨科(15%)、普通创伤骨科(15%)和专业骨科(13%)的外科医生做出了回复。70%的人回答了所有问题,前 10 个国家占了回答人数的一半。教育需求最高的 3 个领域是创伤骨科、关节置换和保存以及骨盆和髋臼。影响参加面对面课程可能性的因素包括:专家教员、关注特定主题、目标明确以及专家的讨论和反馈。参加课程的障碍包括:远离实践的时间、费用以及缺乏可用性或可及性。结论:全球需求分析帮助我们的教育委员会确定了近年来的短期和中期优先事项。调整规划有助于满足全球、地区和国家层面的受众需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信