Framework for industry engagement and quality principles for industry-provided medical education in Europe.

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2017-07-31 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2017.1348876
Tamara Allen, Nina Donde, Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, Sandra Keijser, Veronique Moy, Jean-Jacques Murama, Thomas Kellner
{"title":"Framework for industry engagement and quality principles for industry-provided medical education in Europe.","authors":"Tamara Allen, Nina Donde, Eva Hofstädter-Thalmann, Sandra Keijser, Veronique Moy, Jean-Jacques Murama, Thomas Kellner","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2017.1348876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lifelong learning through continuing professional development (CPD) and medical education is critical for healthcare professionals to stay abreast of knowledge and skills and provide an optimal standard of care to patients. In Europe, CPD and medical education are fragmented as there are numerous models, providers and national regulations and a lack of harmonisation of qualitative criteria. There is continued debate on the appropriate role of pharmaceutical companies in the context of medical education. Accrediting bodies such as European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education do not permit active involvement of the pharmaceutical industry due to concerns around conflicts of interest and potential for bias. However, many examples of active collaboration between pharmaceutical companies and medical societies and scientific experts exist, demonstrating high integrity, clear roles and responsibilities, and fair and balanced content. Medical education experts from 16 pharmaceutical companies met to develop a set of quality principles similar to standards that have been established for clinical trials and in alignment with existing principles of accrediting bodies. This paper outlines their proposal for a framework to improve and harmonise medical education quality standards in Europe, and is also an invitation for all stakeholders to join a discussion on this integrative model.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"6 1","pages":"1348876"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2017.1348876","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2017.1348876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Lifelong learning through continuing professional development (CPD) and medical education is critical for healthcare professionals to stay abreast of knowledge and skills and provide an optimal standard of care to patients. In Europe, CPD and medical education are fragmented as there are numerous models, providers and national regulations and a lack of harmonisation of qualitative criteria. There is continued debate on the appropriate role of pharmaceutical companies in the context of medical education. Accrediting bodies such as European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education do not permit active involvement of the pharmaceutical industry due to concerns around conflicts of interest and potential for bias. However, many examples of active collaboration between pharmaceutical companies and medical societies and scientific experts exist, demonstrating high integrity, clear roles and responsibilities, and fair and balanced content. Medical education experts from 16 pharmaceutical companies met to develop a set of quality principles similar to standards that have been established for clinical trials and in alignment with existing principles of accrediting bodies. This paper outlines their proposal for a framework to improve and harmonise medical education quality standards in Europe, and is also an invitation for all stakeholders to join a discussion on this integrative model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

欧洲行业参与框架和行业提供医学教育的质量原则。
通过持续专业发展(CPD)和医学教育进行终身学习对于医疗保健专业人员跟上知识和技能并为患者提供最佳护理标准至关重要。在欧洲,持续专业发展和医学教育是分散的,因为有许多模式、提供者和国家法规,而且缺乏质量标准的统一。关于制药公司在医学教育方面的适当作用的辩论仍在继续。由于担心利益冲突和潜在的偏见,欧洲继续医学教育认证委员会等认证机构不允许制药行业积极参与。然而,制药公司与医学协会和科学专家之间积极合作的例子有很多,表现出高度的诚信、明确的角色和责任以及公平和平衡的内容。来自16家制药公司的医学教育专家开会制定了一套质量原则,类似于为临床试验制定的标准,并与认证机构的现有原则保持一致。这篇论文概述了他们提出的关于建立一个框架以改善和协调欧洲医学教育质量标准的建议,同时也邀请所有利益相关者加入对这一综合模式的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信