Changes in the Utilization of Mental Health Care Services and Mental Health at the Onset of Medicare.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jordan H Rhodes
{"title":"Changes in the Utilization of Mental Health Care Services and Mental Health at the Onset of Medicare.","authors":"Jordan H Rhodes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The onset of Medicare eligibility at age 65 in the U.S. is accompanied by significant changes in health insurance coverage rates. This presents a unique opportunity to study the interaction among health insurance, health care utilization, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examines if changes in mental health outcomes accompany the changes in health insurance coverage rates at age 65.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2006-2013 data from the Sample Adult and Person File components of the National Health Insurance Survey are used to explore the link between the onset of Medicare and the utilization of mental health care services and mental health. A regression discontinuity design is employed to test for changes in perceived financial barriers to mental health care, visits with mental health professionals, and self-reported mental health. In addition to identifying the overall effect, analysis is also conducted on samples that are stratified by level of education to test for heterogeneous treatment effects across socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coverage changes that occur at age 65 are associated with a substantial decline in self-reported financial barriers to receiving mental health care. This effect is greatest among individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Despite the decline in the percentage of adults claiming they did not obtain mental health care services because of prohibitive costs, no significant changes in mental health visits or self-reported mental health are identified. The implementation of lower cost-sharing requirements for outpatient mental health care through the Medicare Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) has had no statistically significant effect on mental health visits at the age 65 cutoff for Medicare eligibility.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is no estimated change in mental health visits, yet prohibitive costs of mental health care decline, especially among individuals from lower socioeconomic groups. These findings may be the result of newly eligible Medicare enrollees either increasing their utilization of mental health visits on the intensive margin, obtaining alternative sources of treatment for mental illness, or facing other barriers to care that are unrelated to costs. Additionally, estimates pertaining to mental health visits are imprecise, and large changes relative to age 64 means cannot be ruled out.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care provision and use: </strong>There is no evidence that gaining health insurance coverage at age 65 results in increased visits with mental health professionals on the extensive margin.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policy: </strong>For the previously uninsured and under-insured, the onset of Medicare coverage at age 65 results in a reduction in cost-sharing requirements for mental health care. These reductions have no clear effect on overall mental health visit rates. Although the 2010 implementation of MIPPA has gradually lowered cost-sharing requirements for outpatient mental health care, these changes have not affected mental health visits at age 65.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Future research that evaluates whether additional factors, such as residing in a mental health shortage area, can explain the imprecise estimate on mental health visits would be useful. Additionally, future studies that examine the interaction between private insurance and Medicare coverage would better explain the dynamic changes that occur at age 65, and how shifting coverage patterns interact with mental health care utilization rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":"29-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The onset of Medicare eligibility at age 65 in the U.S. is accompanied by significant changes in health insurance coverage rates. This presents a unique opportunity to study the interaction among health insurance, health care utilization, and health outcomes.

Aims: This study examines if changes in mental health outcomes accompany the changes in health insurance coverage rates at age 65.

Methods: 2006-2013 data from the Sample Adult and Person File components of the National Health Insurance Survey are used to explore the link between the onset of Medicare and the utilization of mental health care services and mental health. A regression discontinuity design is employed to test for changes in perceived financial barriers to mental health care, visits with mental health professionals, and self-reported mental health. In addition to identifying the overall effect, analysis is also conducted on samples that are stratified by level of education to test for heterogeneous treatment effects across socioeconomic groups.

Results: The coverage changes that occur at age 65 are associated with a substantial decline in self-reported financial barriers to receiving mental health care. This effect is greatest among individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Despite the decline in the percentage of adults claiming they did not obtain mental health care services because of prohibitive costs, no significant changes in mental health visits or self-reported mental health are identified. The implementation of lower cost-sharing requirements for outpatient mental health care through the Medicare Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) has had no statistically significant effect on mental health visits at the age 65 cutoff for Medicare eligibility.

Discussion: There is no estimated change in mental health visits, yet prohibitive costs of mental health care decline, especially among individuals from lower socioeconomic groups. These findings may be the result of newly eligible Medicare enrollees either increasing their utilization of mental health visits on the intensive margin, obtaining alternative sources of treatment for mental illness, or facing other barriers to care that are unrelated to costs. Additionally, estimates pertaining to mental health visits are imprecise, and large changes relative to age 64 means cannot be ruled out.

Implications for health care provision and use: There is no evidence that gaining health insurance coverage at age 65 results in increased visits with mental health professionals on the extensive margin.

Implications for health policy: For the previously uninsured and under-insured, the onset of Medicare coverage at age 65 results in a reduction in cost-sharing requirements for mental health care. These reductions have no clear effect on overall mental health visit rates. Although the 2010 implementation of MIPPA has gradually lowered cost-sharing requirements for outpatient mental health care, these changes have not affected mental health visits at age 65.

Implications for further research: Future research that evaluates whether additional factors, such as residing in a mental health shortage area, can explain the imprecise estimate on mental health visits would be useful. Additionally, future studies that examine the interaction between private insurance and Medicare coverage would better explain the dynamic changes that occur at age 65, and how shifting coverage patterns interact with mental health care utilization rates.

医疗保险开始时精神卫生保健服务和精神卫生利用的变化。
背景:在美国,65岁开始享有医疗保险资格伴随着健康保险覆盖率的显著变化。这为研究健康保险、医疗保健利用和健康结果之间的相互作用提供了一个独特的机会。目的:本研究考察65岁时心理健康结果的变化是否伴随着健康保险覆盖率的变化。方法:利用2006-2013年全国健康保险调查样本成人和个人档案部分的数据,探讨医疗保险的开始与心理卫生保健服务的利用和心理健康之间的联系。采用回归不连续设计来测试心理健康护理的感知经济障碍、心理健康专业人员访问和自我报告的心理健康状况的变化。除了确定总体效果外,还对按教育水平分层的样本进行了分析,以检验不同社会经济群体的异质性治疗效果。结果:65岁时发生的覆盖变化与自我报告的接受精神卫生保健的财务障碍的大幅下降有关。这种影响在社会经济背景较低的人身上表现得最为明显。尽管声称由于费用过高而没有获得精神保健服务的成年人的百分比有所下降,但在精神保健就诊或自我报告的精神健康状况方面没有发现重大变化。通过2008年《医疗保险患者和提供者法案》(MIPPA)对门诊精神卫生保健的低成本分摊要求的实施,对65岁的医疗保险资格截止年龄的精神卫生就诊没有统计学上的显著影响。讨论:据估计,心理健康就诊没有变化,但令人望而却步的精神卫生保健费用下降了,特别是在社会经济地位较低的群体中。这些发现可能是由于新合格的医疗保险参保人增加了对精神健康访问的利用,获得了精神疾病治疗的替代来源,或者面临与费用无关的其他护理障碍。此外,与心理健康访问有关的估计是不精确的,不能排除与64岁相关的巨大变化。对卫生保健提供和使用的影响:没有证据表明,在65岁时获得健康保险会导致大量心理卫生专业人员的就诊增加。对卫生政策的影响:对于以前没有保险和保险不足的人来说,65岁开始医疗保险可减少精神卫生保健的费用分摊要求。这些减少对总体心理健康就诊率没有明显影响。尽管2010年实施的MIPPA逐步降低了门诊精神卫生保健的费用分摊要求,但这些变化并未影响65岁人群的精神卫生就诊。对进一步研究的启示:未来的研究评估是否有其他因素,如居住在精神卫生短缺地区,可以解释对精神卫生就诊的不精确估计,这将是有用的。此外,未来研究私人保险和医疗保险覆盖率之间的相互作用将更好地解释65岁时发生的动态变化,以及保险模式的变化如何与精神卫生保健使用率相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信