[Development of the Japanese version of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire and evaluation of its reliability and validity].

Q4 Psychology
Masanori Kobayashi, Yosuke Hattori, Taiji Ueno, Jun Kawaguchi
{"title":"[Development of the Japanese version of the Thought Control Ability Questionnaire and evaluation of its reliability and validity].","authors":"Masanori Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yosuke Hattori,&nbsp;Taiji Ueno,&nbsp;Jun Kawaguchi","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.15217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intrusive thoughts and difficulty in controlling thoughts are common, not only for people with psychological disorders, but also for healthy people. Individual differences in thought control ability may underlie such problems. The Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ), which consists of 25 items, was developed by Luciano et al. (2005) in order to measure individual differences in the perceived ability to control unwanted intrusive thoughts. The purpose of the present study was to develop the Japanese version of the TCAQ and evaluate its reliability and validity. We translated the English version of the TCAQ into Japanese. We also conducted confirmatory factor analysis with a one factor solution, similar to the previous study. Based on the analysis, we excluded items whose factor loadings were lower than .30, resulting in 22 items for the Japanese version of the TCAQ. The model exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit. The Japanese version of the TCAQ also demonstrated good reliability as well as evidence of construct validity. Thus, the development of the Japanese version of the TCAQ was successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.15217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intrusive thoughts and difficulty in controlling thoughts are common, not only for people with psychological disorders, but also for healthy people. Individual differences in thought control ability may underlie such problems. The Thought Control Ability Questionnaire (TCAQ), which consists of 25 items, was developed by Luciano et al. (2005) in order to measure individual differences in the perceived ability to control unwanted intrusive thoughts. The purpose of the present study was to develop the Japanese version of the TCAQ and evaluate its reliability and validity. We translated the English version of the TCAQ into Japanese. We also conducted confirmatory factor analysis with a one factor solution, similar to the previous study. Based on the analysis, we excluded items whose factor loadings were lower than .30, resulting in 22 items for the Japanese version of the TCAQ. The model exhibited acceptable goodness-of-fit. The Japanese version of the TCAQ also demonstrated good reliability as well as evidence of construct validity. Thus, the development of the Japanese version of the TCAQ was successful.

[日文版思想控制能力问卷的编制及其信效度评价]。
侵入性的想法和难以控制的想法是常见的,不仅对有心理障碍的人,而且对健康的人。思想控制能力的个体差异可能是这些问题的根源。思想控制能力问卷(TCAQ)由Luciano et al.(2005)开发,包含25个项目,旨在衡量个体在控制不想要的侵入性思想的感知能力方面的差异。本研究的目的是开发日语版的工作能力评估量表,并评估其信度和效度。我们把英语版的TCAQ翻译成了日语。与之前的研究类似,我们也采用单因素解决方案进行了验证性因子分析。在分析的基础上,我们排除了因子负荷量低于0.30的条目,日文版TCAQ共有22个条目。该模型显示出可接受的拟合优度。日语版的TCAQ也表现出良好的信度和构念效度证据。因此,日文版TCAQ的开发是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信