Paul J Brady, Martina Hayes, Christine E McCreary, Ken D O'Halloran, Joseph A Giovannitti
{"title":"What’s new in... Capnography Monitoring for Dental Conscious Sedation: A Clinical Review.","authors":"Paul J Brady, Martina Hayes, Christine E McCreary, Ken D O'Halloran, Joseph A Giovannitti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capnography monitoring during conscious sedation is not\ncurrently required for dentistry in Britain and Ireland. Other\ncountries have introduced guidelines and standards requiring\ncapnography monitoring for procedural sedation. This review\nhighlights the variability of procedural sedation including the\nsetting, the position on the sedation continuum, and the routine\nuse of supplemental oxygen. Specific research is required for\nconscious sedation in a dental setting to support standards and\nguidelines with regard to capnography monitoring.\nThe Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties\nemphasise that each specialty must produce its own guidance for\nthe use of sedative techniques.1 Clinical practice guidelines for the\nmonitoring and safe practice of sedation vary by specialty and\ninstitution. Standards are generally set from the best available\nevidence based research. There is a growing body of literature that\nrecognises the potential additional value of capnography (ETCO2)\nmonitoring during procedural sedation in different settings and for\ndifferent sedation techniques.2-5 In these studies, capnography\nreduced the incidence of hypoxaemia during procedural sedation.\nA meta-analysis published by Waugh et al. (2010) concluded that\nend-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is an important addition in\ndetecting respiratory depression during procedural sedation.6 A\nmore recent systematic review by Conway et al. (2016) concluded\nthat patients monitored with capnography in addition to standard\nmonitoring had a reduced risk of hypoxaemia compared to those\nwith only standard monitoring.7 However, it has to be noted that\nboth the Waugh and Conway reviews contained substantial\nstatistical heterogenicity which is likely to affect the quality of the\nevidence.\nAs research evidence for capnography monitoring from the\nmedical settings studied became available, new standards for\ncapnography monitoring were introduced in several countries\n(Table 1).</p>","PeriodicalId":21571,"journal":{"name":"SAAD digest","volume":"33 ","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAAD digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Capnography monitoring during conscious sedation is not
currently required for dentistry in Britain and Ireland. Other
countries have introduced guidelines and standards requiring
capnography monitoring for procedural sedation. This review
highlights the variability of procedural sedation including the
setting, the position on the sedation continuum, and the routine
use of supplemental oxygen. Specific research is required for
conscious sedation in a dental setting to support standards and
guidelines with regard to capnography monitoring.
The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties
emphasise that each specialty must produce its own guidance for
the use of sedative techniques.1 Clinical practice guidelines for the
monitoring and safe practice of sedation vary by specialty and
institution. Standards are generally set from the best available
evidence based research. There is a growing body of literature that
recognises the potential additional value of capnography (ETCO2)
monitoring during procedural sedation in different settings and for
different sedation techniques.2-5 In these studies, capnography
reduced the incidence of hypoxaemia during procedural sedation.
A meta-analysis published by Waugh et al. (2010) concluded that
end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring is an important addition in
detecting respiratory depression during procedural sedation.6 A
more recent systematic review by Conway et al. (2016) concluded
that patients monitored with capnography in addition to standard
monitoring had a reduced risk of hypoxaemia compared to those
with only standard monitoring.7 However, it has to be noted that
both the Waugh and Conway reviews contained substantial
statistical heterogenicity which is likely to affect the quality of the
evidence.
As research evidence for capnography monitoring from the
medical settings studied became available, new standards for
capnography monitoring were introduced in several countries
(Table 1).