Two randomized studies to evaluate the cooling sensation, consumer liking, and tolerability of a skin disinfectant spray.

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Journal of cosmetic science Pub Date : 2017-05-01
Peili Gong, Nan Wang, Lei Guan, Wei Lai
{"title":"Two randomized studies to evaluate the cooling sensation, consumer liking, and tolerability of a skin disinfectant spray.","authors":"Peili Gong,&nbsp;Nan Wang,&nbsp;Lei Guan,&nbsp;Wei Lai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of these two clinical studies was to evaluate the sensory characteristics and irritation potential of a prototype disinfectant spray (containing 0.13% w/v benzalkonium chloride and a cooling agent) in subjects with experimental wounds. The pilot study was a single center, \"replicated latinClinicalTrials.ClinicalTrials. square design,\" randomized and double-blinded study. The pivotal study was a single center, randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blinded study, following a direct comparison test design of the study products. The experimental wounds were generated using sequential tape strippings of the forearm skin before product application. The test product was compared with the currently marketed BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray, negative control (0.9% w/v saline), and positive control (70% w/v isopropyl alcohol, pilot study only). The pilot study was intended to inform the study design and sample size for the pivotal study. The pilot study demonstrated that the positive control product delivered significantly more irritancy (stinging /burning sensory) than the negative control product on the experimental wound, which verified the integrity of the wound model. The results of the pivotal study suggested that the prototype formulation delivered significantly more cooling sensation than both BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray and negative control at 3 and 5 min after product application, and overall for a 15-min period after application. No statistically significant differences in product liking were observed between the prototype disinfectant spray and the BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray or negative control. The prototype disinfectant spray, BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray, and control products were well-tolerated in these studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cosmetic science","volume":"68 3","pages":"205-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cosmetic science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of these two clinical studies was to evaluate the sensory characteristics and irritation potential of a prototype disinfectant spray (containing 0.13% w/v benzalkonium chloride and a cooling agent) in subjects with experimental wounds. The pilot study was a single center, "replicated latinClinicalTrials.ClinicalTrials. square design," randomized and double-blinded study. The pivotal study was a single center, randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blinded study, following a direct comparison test design of the study products. The experimental wounds were generated using sequential tape strippings of the forearm skin before product application. The test product was compared with the currently marketed BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray, negative control (0.9% w/v saline), and positive control (70% w/v isopropyl alcohol, pilot study only). The pilot study was intended to inform the study design and sample size for the pivotal study. The pilot study demonstrated that the positive control product delivered significantly more irritancy (stinging /burning sensory) than the negative control product on the experimental wound, which verified the integrity of the wound model. The results of the pivotal study suggested that the prototype formulation delivered significantly more cooling sensation than both BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray and negative control at 3 and 5 min after product application, and overall for a 15-min period after application. No statistically significant differences in product liking were observed between the prototype disinfectant spray and the BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray or negative control. The prototype disinfectant spray, BACTROBAN® disinfectant spray, and control products were well-tolerated in these studies.

两项随机研究评估皮肤消毒喷雾的冷却感觉、消费者喜好和耐受性。
这两项临床研究的目的是评估一种原型消毒剂喷雾(含有0.13% w/v的苯扎氯铵和一种冷却剂)对实验性伤口受试者的感觉特性和刺激潜力。试点研究是一个单中心,“重复临床试验”。方形设计,随机双盲研究。关键研究是单中心、随机、对照、交叉、双盲研究,遵循研究产品的直接比较试验设计。实验伤口是在产品应用前用连续胶带剥离前臂皮肤产生的。将试验产品与目前上市的BACTROBAN®消毒液喷雾、阴性对照(0.9% w/v生理盐水)和阳性对照(70% w/v异丙醇,仅为中试研究)进行比较。该初步研究旨在为关键研究的研究设计和样本量提供信息。初步研究表明,阳性对照产品对实验创面的刺激性(刺痛/灼烧感)明显高于阴性对照产品,验证了创面模型的完整性。关键研究的结果表明,在产品应用后3和5分钟,以及应用后15分钟的总体时间内,原型配方比BACTROBAN®消毒剂喷雾和阴性对照提供了明显更好的冷却感觉。在原型消毒喷雾和BACTROBAN®消毒喷雾或阴性对照之间,产品喜好没有统计学上的显著差异。在这些研究中,原型消毒喷雾、BACTROBAN®消毒喷雾和对照产品耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cosmetic science
Journal of cosmetic science 工程技术-皮肤病学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE (JCS) publishes papers concerned with cosmetics, cosmetic products, fragrances, their formulation and their effects in skin care or in overall consumer well-being, as well as papers relating to the sciences underlying cosmetics, such as human skin physiology, color physics, physical chemistry of colloids and emulsions, or psychological effects of olfaction in humans. Papers of interest to the cosmetic industry and to the understanding of the cosmetic markets are also welcome for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信