Continuous Flash Glucose Monitoring in children with Congenital Hyperinsulinism; first report on accuracy and patient experience.

Hussain Alsaffar, Lucy Turner, Zoe Yung, Mohammed Didi, Senthil Senniappan
{"title":"Continuous Flash Glucose Monitoring in children with Congenital Hyperinsulinism; first report on accuracy and patient experience.","authors":"Hussain Alsaffar,&nbsp;Lucy Turner,&nbsp;Zoe Yung,&nbsp;Mohammed Didi,&nbsp;Senthil Senniappan","doi":"10.1186/s13633-018-0057-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The factory calibrated FreeStyle Libre (FSL) flash glucose monitoring system has been recently introduced for use in patients with diabetes mellitus. There are no reports available regarding its use in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). We have assessed the accuracy of FSL compared to the finger prick capillary blood glucose (CBG) over 2 weeks period in patients with CHI and evaluated the parents' experience of using FSL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred sixty-seven episodes of CBG along with corresponding swipe FSL readings were available from 11 children with CHI (0.5-5 years). A detailed questionnaire was completed by the parents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean variation between the two methods was 0.29 mmol/l (SD ±1.07), higher readings by FSL compared to CBG. The FSL sensors stayed in-situ for an average period of 11.5 days. There was a positive correlation between the two methods (<i>r</i> = 0.7). The FSL tended to overestimate compared to CBG (bias = 0.29 mmol/l; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.38). Only 70% of values were within the reference standard (±0.83 mmol/l) at glucose concentrations less than 5.6 mmol/l. The overall Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) was 17.9%. Forty two episodes of hypoglycaemia (CBG < 3.5 mmol/l) were noted but FSL identified only 52% of these episodes. The Bland Altman analysis showed the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods ranging from - 1.8 (95% CI: -1.97 to - 1.64) to 2.37 (95% CI: 2.21 to 2.54). Majority of the parents found the glucose trend on FSL to be useful to detect and prevent hypoglycaemic episodes. All parents felt that FSL is a very easy and convenient method to measure the glucose especially during sleep. A significant proportion of parents felt that FSL readings were not accurate and 56% of parents expressed interest to continue using FSL after the trial period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noticeable variability between the two methods of measuring the glucose was noted. Despite the ease of using the FSL system, concerns related to accuracy, especially at low glucose values do remain although parents find the glucose trend to be very useful. Further larger trials are needed in CHI patients before FSL is recommended as a routine alternative method for measuring glucose levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":14271,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13633-018-0057-2","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13633-018-0057-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: The factory calibrated FreeStyle Libre (FSL) flash glucose monitoring system has been recently introduced for use in patients with diabetes mellitus. There are no reports available regarding its use in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). We have assessed the accuracy of FSL compared to the finger prick capillary blood glucose (CBG) over 2 weeks period in patients with CHI and evaluated the parents' experience of using FSL.

Methods: Four hundred sixty-seven episodes of CBG along with corresponding swipe FSL readings were available from 11 children with CHI (0.5-5 years). A detailed questionnaire was completed by the parents.

Results: The mean variation between the two methods was 0.29 mmol/l (SD ±1.07), higher readings by FSL compared to CBG. The FSL sensors stayed in-situ for an average period of 11.5 days. There was a positive correlation between the two methods (r = 0.7). The FSL tended to overestimate compared to CBG (bias = 0.29 mmol/l; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.38). Only 70% of values were within the reference standard (±0.83 mmol/l) at glucose concentrations less than 5.6 mmol/l. The overall Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) was 17.9%. Forty two episodes of hypoglycaemia (CBG < 3.5 mmol/l) were noted but FSL identified only 52% of these episodes. The Bland Altman analysis showed the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods ranging from - 1.8 (95% CI: -1.97 to - 1.64) to 2.37 (95% CI: 2.21 to 2.54). Majority of the parents found the glucose trend on FSL to be useful to detect and prevent hypoglycaemic episodes. All parents felt that FSL is a very easy and convenient method to measure the glucose especially during sleep. A significant proportion of parents felt that FSL readings were not accurate and 56% of parents expressed interest to continue using FSL after the trial period.

Conclusion: Noticeable variability between the two methods of measuring the glucose was noted. Despite the ease of using the FSL system, concerns related to accuracy, especially at low glucose values do remain although parents find the glucose trend to be very useful. Further larger trials are needed in CHI patients before FSL is recommended as a routine alternative method for measuring glucose levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

先天性高胰岛素血症患儿连续血糖监测第一份关于准确性和患者经验的报告。
背景:工厂校准的FreeStyle Libre (FSL)瞬时血糖监测系统最近被引进用于糖尿病患者。目前尚无关于其用于先天性高胰岛素血症(CHI)患者的报道。我们对CHI患者2周内FSL与手指穿刺毛细血管血糖(CBG)的准确性进行了比较,并对家长使用FSL的经验进行了评估。方法:对11例CHI患儿(0.5-5岁)进行467次CBG和相应的刷刷FSL读数。家长们填写了一份详细的问卷。结果:两种方法的平均差异为0.29 mmol/l (SD±1.07),FSL比CBG高。FSL传感器在原位平均停留时间为11.5天。两种方法呈正相关(r = 0.7)。与CBG相比,FSL倾向于高估(偏差= 0.29 mmol/l;95% CI: 0.19 ~ 0.38)。当葡萄糖浓度低于5.6 mmol/l时,只有70%的值在参考标准(±0.83 mmol/l)范围内。总体平均绝对相对差(MARD)为17.9%。结论:两种血糖测量方法之间存在明显的差异。尽管使用FSL系统很容易,但与准确性有关的问题,特别是在低血糖值时,仍然存在,尽管家长们发现葡萄糖趋势非常有用。在推荐FSL作为常规替代方法测量血糖水平之前,需要在CHI患者中进行更大规模的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信