Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer.

Q3 Medicine
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5
Laurence Bernier, Svetlana Balyasnikova, Diana Tait, Gina Brown
{"title":"Watch-and-Wait as a Therapeutic Strategy in Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Laurence Bernier,&nbsp;Svetlana Balyasnikova,&nbsp;Diana Tait,&nbsp;Gina Brown","doi":"10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Pathological complete response is seen in approximately one fifth of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Since these patients have excellent oncological outcomes, there has been a rapidly growing interest in organ preservation for those who develop a clinical complete response. We review the watch-and-wait strategy and focus on all aspects of this hot topic, including who should be considered for this approach, how should we identify treatment response and what are the expected outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The major challenges in interpreting the data on watch-and-wait are the significant heterogeneity of patients selected for this approach and of methods employed to identify them. The evidence available comes mostly from retrospective cohort studies, but has shown good oncological outcomes, including the rate of successful salvage surgery, locoregional control and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is currently not enough and not robust enough evidence to support watch-and-wait as a standard approach, outside a clinical trial, for patients achieving clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on long-term outcomes. However, the results we have so far are promising, and there is therefore an urgent need for randomised control studies such as the TRIGGER trial to confirm the safety of this strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45986,"journal":{"name":"Current Colorectal Cancer Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Colorectal Cancer Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0398-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Purpose of review: Pathological complete response is seen in approximately one fifth of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Since these patients have excellent oncological outcomes, there has been a rapidly growing interest in organ preservation for those who develop a clinical complete response. We review the watch-and-wait strategy and focus on all aspects of this hot topic, including who should be considered for this approach, how should we identify treatment response and what are the expected outcomes.

Recent findings: The major challenges in interpreting the data on watch-and-wait are the significant heterogeneity of patients selected for this approach and of methods employed to identify them. The evidence available comes mostly from retrospective cohort studies, but has shown good oncological outcomes, including the rate of successful salvage surgery, locoregional control and overall survival.

Summary: There is currently not enough and not robust enough evidence to support watch-and-wait as a standard approach, outside a clinical trial, for patients achieving clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on long-term outcomes. However, the results we have so far are promising, and there is therefore an urgent need for randomised control studies such as the TRIGGER trial to confirm the safety of this strategy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

观察和等待作为直肠癌的治疗策略。
回顾的目的:大约五分之一的直肠癌患者在新辅助放化疗后出现病理完全缓解。由于这些患者具有良好的肿瘤预后,因此对那些临床完全缓解的患者进行器官保存的兴趣迅速增长。我们回顾了观察和等待策略,并关注这一热门话题的各个方面,包括应该考虑谁采用这种方法,我们应该如何确定治疗反应以及预期结果是什么。最近的发现:解释观察等待数据的主要挑战是采用这种方法选择的患者的显著异质性以及用于识别他们的方法。现有的证据主要来自回顾性队列研究,但已显示出良好的肿瘤学结果,包括挽救性手术的成功率、局部区域控制和总生存率。总结:目前没有足够的证据支持观察等待作为临床试验之外的标准方法,用于新辅助放化疗后患者达到临床完全缓解。此外,缺乏长期结果的数据。然而,到目前为止,我们的结果是有希望的,因此迫切需要随机对照研究,如TRIGGER试验,以确认该策略的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of colorectal cancer. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those with the disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and emerging therapeutic approaches and the molecular basis of disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信