Validation of Response Similarity Analysis for the Detection of Academic Cheating: An Experimental Study.

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2018-01-01
Georgios D Sideridis, Cengiz Zopluoglu
{"title":"Validation of Response Similarity Analysis for the Detection of Academic Cheating: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Georgios D Sideridis,&nbsp;Cengiz Zopluoglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate various analytical means to detect academic cheating in an experimental setting. The omega index was compared and contrasted given a gold criterion of academic cheating which entailed a discrepant score between two administrations using an experimental study with real test takers. Participants were 164 elementary school students who were administered a mathematics exam followed by an equivalent mock exam under conditions of strict and relaxed, invigilation, respectively. Discrepant scores were defined as exceeding 7 responses in any direction (correct or incorrect), based on what was expected due to chance. Results indicated that the omega index was successful in capturing more than 39% of the cases who exceeded the conventional plus or minus 7 discrepancy criteria. It is concluded that the response similarity analysis may be an important tool in detecting academic cheating.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"19 1","pages":"59-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate various analytical means to detect academic cheating in an experimental setting. The omega index was compared and contrasted given a gold criterion of academic cheating which entailed a discrepant score between two administrations using an experimental study with real test takers. Participants were 164 elementary school students who were administered a mathematics exam followed by an equivalent mock exam under conditions of strict and relaxed, invigilation, respectively. Discrepant scores were defined as exceeding 7 responses in any direction (correct or incorrect), based on what was expected due to chance. Results indicated that the omega index was successful in capturing more than 39% of the cases who exceeded the conventional plus or minus 7 discrepancy criteria. It is concluded that the response similarity analysis may be an important tool in detecting academic cheating.

响应相似度分析在学术作弊检测中的验证:一项实验研究。
本研究的目的是在实验环境中评估各种检测学术作弊的分析方法。通过对真实考生进行实验研究,将omega指数与学术作弊的黄金标准进行比较和对比,该标准涉及两个管理部门之间的差异分数。参与者是164名小学生,他们分别在严格和宽松的监考条件下进行数学考试和模拟考试。差异分数被定义为在任何方向(正确或不正确)超过7个答案,基于偶然的预期。结果表明,omega指数成功捕获超过39%的超过常规正负7差异标准的病例。结果表明,响应相似度分析可能是检测学术作弊的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信