N W Badri, S W Flatt, H S Barkai, B Pakiz, D D Heath, C L Rock
{"title":"Insulin Resistance Improves More in Women than In Men in Association with a Weight Loss Intervention.","authors":"N W Badri, S W Flatt, H S Barkai, B Pakiz, D D Heath, C L Rock","doi":"10.4172/2165-7904.1000365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fasting glucose and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) are important measures of the risk for metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Weight loss interventions are considered part of the first line of therapy for those who develop disease states associated with insulin resistance, such as pre-diabetes, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome. Sex differences in insulin resistance have been extensively reported, but sex differences in the ability to improve insulin sensitivity are not well-established. This study sought to identify factors that predict change in HOMA-IR in response to weight loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-diabetic subjects who were overweight/obese (n=100) were randomly assigned to a walnut-enriched reduced-energy diet or a standard reduced-energy-density diet in a 6-month weight loss intervention. There were no significant differences in weight change, glucose, insulin, or HOMA-IR between the two diet groups. These subjects were combined into a single cohort and analyzed with multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined groups lost an average of 8.7 kg (p<0.0001), decreased serum glucose by an average 0.2 mmol/L (p<0.001), and decreased HOMA-IR by an average of 1.4 (p<0.0001). Change in HOMA-IR (R<sup>2</sup>=0.69) was positively associated with weight change (p<0.0001) and male sex (p<0.01), and negatively associated with baseline HOMA-IR (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study suggest that men may have a more difficult time improving insulin sensitivity as compared with women with an equivalent weight loss and baseline HOMA-IR. One hypothesis to explain the differences across sexes may be due to sex differences in visceral adipose fat (VAT). This may mean that insulin resistant men require more aggressive intervention than women to prevent progression to metabolic syndrome or diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":89692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obesity & weight loss therapy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7904.1000365","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obesity & weight loss therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.1000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Background: Fasting glucose and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) are important measures of the risk for metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Weight loss interventions are considered part of the first line of therapy for those who develop disease states associated with insulin resistance, such as pre-diabetes, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome. Sex differences in insulin resistance have been extensively reported, but sex differences in the ability to improve insulin sensitivity are not well-established. This study sought to identify factors that predict change in HOMA-IR in response to weight loss.
Methods: Non-diabetic subjects who were overweight/obese (n=100) were randomly assigned to a walnut-enriched reduced-energy diet or a standard reduced-energy-density diet in a 6-month weight loss intervention. There were no significant differences in weight change, glucose, insulin, or HOMA-IR between the two diet groups. These subjects were combined into a single cohort and analyzed with multivariate analysis.
Results: The combined groups lost an average of 8.7 kg (p<0.0001), decreased serum glucose by an average 0.2 mmol/L (p<0.001), and decreased HOMA-IR by an average of 1.4 (p<0.0001). Change in HOMA-IR (R2=0.69) was positively associated with weight change (p<0.0001) and male sex (p<0.01), and negatively associated with baseline HOMA-IR (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest that men may have a more difficult time improving insulin sensitivity as compared with women with an equivalent weight loss and baseline HOMA-IR. One hypothesis to explain the differences across sexes may be due to sex differences in visceral adipose fat (VAT). This may mean that insulin resistant men require more aggressive intervention than women to prevent progression to metabolic syndrome or diabetes.
背景:空腹血糖和稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)是衡量代谢综合征和糖尿病风险的重要指标。对于那些出现与胰岛素抵抗相关的疾病状态的人,如糖尿病前期、糖尿病或代谢综合征,减肥干预被认为是第一线治疗的一部分。胰岛素抵抗的性别差异已被广泛报道,但改善胰岛素敏感性的能力的性别差异尚未得到证实。本研究旨在确定体重减轻后HOMA-IR变化的预测因素。方法:在为期6个月的减肥干预中,非糖尿病超重/肥胖受试者(n=100)被随机分配到富含核桃的低能量饮食或标准低能量密度饮食。在两个饮食组之间,体重变化、血糖、胰岛素或HOMA-IR没有显著差异。将这些受试者合并为单一队列,并进行多变量分析。结果:联合组平均减重8.7 kg (p2=0.69)与体重变化呈正相关(结论:本研究结果表明,与具有相同体重减轻和基线HOMA-IR的女性相比,男性可能更难改善胰岛素敏感性。一种解释性别差异的假设可能是由于内脏脂肪(VAT)的性别差异。这可能意味着胰岛素抵抗的男性比女性需要更积极的干预来预防代谢综合征或糖尿病的进展。