Correlation between Virtual Screening Performance and Binding Site Descriptors of Protein Targets.

International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Pub Date : 2018-01-11 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/3829307
Jamal Shamsara
{"title":"Correlation between Virtual Screening Performance and Binding Site Descriptors of Protein Targets.","authors":"Jamal Shamsara","doi":"10.1155/2018/3829307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rescoring is a simple approach that theoretically could improve the original docking results. In this study AutoDock Vina was used as a docked engine and three other scoring functions besides the original scoring function, Vina, as well as their combinations as consensus scoring functions were employed to explore the effect of rescoring on virtual screenings that had been done on diverse targets. Rescoring by DrugScore produces the most number of cases with significant changes in screening power. Thus, the DrugScore results were used to build a simple model based on two binding site descriptors that could predict possible improvement by DrugScore rescoring. Furthermore, generally the screening power of all rescoring approach as well as original AutoDock Vina docking results correlated with the Maximum Theoretical Shape Complementarity (MTSC) and Maximum Distance from Center of Mass and all Alpha spheres (MDCMA). Therefore, it was suggested that, with a more complete set of binding site descriptors, it could be possible to find robust relationship between binding site descriptors and response to certain molecular docking programs and scoring functions. The results could be helpful for future researches aiming to do a virtual screening using AutoDock Vina and/or rescoring using DrugScore.</p>","PeriodicalId":14082,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3829307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3829307","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3829307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Rescoring is a simple approach that theoretically could improve the original docking results. In this study AutoDock Vina was used as a docked engine and three other scoring functions besides the original scoring function, Vina, as well as their combinations as consensus scoring functions were employed to explore the effect of rescoring on virtual screenings that had been done on diverse targets. Rescoring by DrugScore produces the most number of cases with significant changes in screening power. Thus, the DrugScore results were used to build a simple model based on two binding site descriptors that could predict possible improvement by DrugScore rescoring. Furthermore, generally the screening power of all rescoring approach as well as original AutoDock Vina docking results correlated with the Maximum Theoretical Shape Complementarity (MTSC) and Maximum Distance from Center of Mass and all Alpha spheres (MDCMA). Therefore, it was suggested that, with a more complete set of binding site descriptors, it could be possible to find robust relationship between binding site descriptors and response to certain molecular docking programs and scoring functions. The results could be helpful for future researches aiming to do a virtual screening using AutoDock Vina and/or rescoring using DrugScore.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

虚拟筛选性能与蛋白靶点结合位点描述子的相关性研究。
重新评分是一种简单的方法,理论上可以改善原有的对接结果。本研究采用AutoDock Vina作为对接引擎,并采用除原有评分函数Vina外的其他三个评分函数及其组合作为共识评分函数,探讨评分对不同目标的虚拟筛选的影响。以DrugScore评分产生的病例数最多,筛选能力变化显著。因此,我们使用DrugScore的结果来建立一个基于两个结合位点描述符的简单模型,该模型可以通过DrugScore评分来预测可能的改善。此外,一般来说,所有评分方法的筛选能力以及原始AutoDock Vina对接结果与最大理论形状互补性(MTSC)和最大到质心和所有阿尔法球的距离(MDCMA)相关。因此,我们认为,有了更完整的结合位点描述子集,就有可能找到结合位点描述子与某些分子对接程序和评分函数的响应之间的稳健关系。这些结果可能有助于未来的研究,旨在使用AutoDock Vina进行虚拟筛选和/或使用DrugScore进行评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of chemistry associated with drug discovery, design, and synthesis. International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of chemistry associated with drug discovery, design, and synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信