Medicaid and Migrant Farmworkers: Why the State Residency Requirement Presents a Significant Access Barrier and What States Should Do About It.

Malea Hetrick
{"title":"Medicaid and Migrant Farmworkers: Why the State Residency Requirement Presents a Significant Access Barrier and What States Should Do About It.","authors":"Malea Hetrick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicaid is failing to meet the health needs of qualified migrant farmworkers because of their migratory lifestyle. This population\nmoves frequently, following various agricultural harvests, and the state residency requirements imposed by Medicaid create a significant\naccess barrier that most migrant farmworkers cannot overcome. Migrant farmworkers are unable to overcome the state residency\nrequirement for several reasons: language and cultural barriers, the difficulty in applying, and statutory impediments such as the five-year\nban and the proof-of-citizenship requirement. Several states have attempted to integrate migrant farmworkers into both their state-run\nMedicaid and general public health systems with varying degrees of success. Both Texas and Wisconsin have implemented creative\nsolutions to this Medicaid coverage problem and these existing models will be examined for both strengths and weaknesses. Finally, after\nassessing whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a state provide U.S. citizen migrant\nfarmworkers with access to Medicaid despite their transient lifestyles, I will propose three possible solutions to the problem—the ACA\nMedicaid Expansion, a hybrid Wisconsin/Texas model, and individualized solutions tailored to each state.</p>","PeriodicalId":73212,"journal":{"name":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medicaid is failing to meet the health needs of qualified migrant farmworkers because of their migratory lifestyle. This population moves frequently, following various agricultural harvests, and the state residency requirements imposed by Medicaid create a significant access barrier that most migrant farmworkers cannot overcome. Migrant farmworkers are unable to overcome the state residency requirement for several reasons: language and cultural barriers, the difficulty in applying, and statutory impediments such as the five-year ban and the proof-of-citizenship requirement. Several states have attempted to integrate migrant farmworkers into both their state-run Medicaid and general public health systems with varying degrees of success. Both Texas and Wisconsin have implemented creative solutions to this Medicaid coverage problem and these existing models will be examined for both strengths and weaknesses. Finally, after assessing whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that a state provide U.S. citizen migrant farmworkers with access to Medicaid despite their transient lifestyles, I will propose three possible solutions to the problem—the ACA Medicaid Expansion, a hybrid Wisconsin/Texas model, and individualized solutions tailored to each state.

医疗补助和移民农场工人:为什么州居住要求提出了一个重大的准入障碍,以及各州应该做些什么。
由于合格的农民工的迁移生活方式,医疗补助计划未能满足他们的健康需求。随着各种农业丰收,这些人口流动频繁,医疗补助计划强加的州居住要求造成了一个重大的准入障碍,大多数农民工无法克服。由于语言和文化障碍,申请困难,以及法定障碍,如五年禁令和公民身份证明要求,农民工无法克服国家的居住要求。几个州已经尝试将农民工纳入州运营的医疗补助计划和一般公共卫生系统,并取得了不同程度的成功。德州和威斯康辛州都对医疗补助覆盖问题实施了创造性的解决方案,这些现有的模式将被检查其优缺点。最后,在评估了第十四修正案的平等保护条款是否要求一个州为美国公民移民农场工人提供医疗补助,尽管他们的生活方式是暂时的之后,我将提出三种可能的解决方案——ACAMedicaid扩展,威斯康星州/德克萨斯州混合模式,以及为每个州量身定制的个性化解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信