{"title":"Biologic Drugs, Biosimilars, and Barriers to Entry.","authors":"Joanna M Shepherd","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic drugs represent an important new category of drugs in the effort to improve health outcomes in this country. Yet, these\ncutting-edge drugs are often cost prohibitive, preventing access for many Americans. Recognizing the need for more affordable, generic\nsubstitutes for biologic drugs—or biosimilars—Congress recently created a biosimilars approval pathway that would enable these\ncheaper biologic drugs to obtain FDA approval and reach patients more quickly. Unfortunately, original biologics manufacturers have\nsought to extend their current monopoly profits by erecting various legal and regulatory barriers to entry. Their legal maneuvers take\nmany forms, from delaying approval of safe biosimilars to abrogating previous commitments to international drug-naming protocols, and\neven circumventing Congressional intent for biosimilar substitution. Regrettably, these policies reduce competition in the market for\nbiologic drugs, impede drug innovation, increase drug costs, and limit patient access to these important medications. This article explores\nthe conflict between biologics and biosimilars, and the consequences that barriers to biosimilar entry in this market will create.</p>","PeriodicalId":73212,"journal":{"name":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biologic drugs represent an important new category of drugs in the effort to improve health outcomes in this country. Yet, these
cutting-edge drugs are often cost prohibitive, preventing access for many Americans. Recognizing the need for more affordable, generic
substitutes for biologic drugs—or biosimilars—Congress recently created a biosimilars approval pathway that would enable these
cheaper biologic drugs to obtain FDA approval and reach patients more quickly. Unfortunately, original biologics manufacturers have
sought to extend their current monopoly profits by erecting various legal and regulatory barriers to entry. Their legal maneuvers take
many forms, from delaying approval of safe biosimilars to abrogating previous commitments to international drug-naming protocols, and
even circumventing Congressional intent for biosimilar substitution. Regrettably, these policies reduce competition in the market for
biologic drugs, impede drug innovation, increase drug costs, and limit patient access to these important medications. This article explores
the conflict between biologics and biosimilars, and the consequences that barriers to biosimilar entry in this market will create.