Comparison of laboratory and ambulatory measures of central blood pressure and pulse wave reflection: hitting the target or missing the mark?

Q1 Medicine
Matthew J. Burns MSc , Jeremy D. Seed BSc , Anthony V. Incognito MSc , Connor J. Doherty BSc , Karambir Notay BSc , Philip J. Millar PhD
{"title":"Comparison of laboratory and ambulatory measures of central blood pressure and pulse wave reflection: hitting the target or missing the mark?","authors":"Matthew J. Burns MSc ,&nbsp;Jeremy D. Seed BSc ,&nbsp;Anthony V. Incognito MSc ,&nbsp;Connor J. Doherty BSc ,&nbsp;Karambir Notay BSc ,&nbsp;Philip J. Millar PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Prior studies demonstrating clinical significance<span><span> of noninvasive estimates of central blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave reflection have relied primarily on discrete resting measures. The aim of this study was to compare central BP and pulse wave reflection measures sampled during a single resting laboratory visit against those obtained under ambulatory conditions. The secondary aim was to investigate the reproducibility of ambulatory central BP and pulse wave reflection measurements. Forty healthy participants (21 males; 24 ± 3 years) completed three measurements of brachial artery pulse wave analysis (Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor Inside) in the laboratory followed by 24 hours of </span>ambulatory monitoring<span>. Seventeen participants repeated the 24-hour ambulatory monitoring visit after at least 1 week. Ambulatory measures were divided into daytime (9 AM–9 PM), nighttime (1 AM–6 AM), and 24-hour periods. Compared with laboratory measurements, central systolic BP, augmentation pressure, and augmentation index (with and without heart rate normalization) were higher (all </span></span></span><em>P</em> &lt; .01) during daytime and 24-hour periods but lower during the nighttime period (all <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The drop in nighttime brachial systolic BP was larger than central systolic pressure (Δ −20 ± 6 vs. −15 ± 6 mm Hg; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Repeat ambulatory measurements of central BP and pulse wave reflection displayed good-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (r = 0.58–0.86; all <em>P</em> &lt; .01), although measures of pulse wave reflection had higher coefficients of variation (14%–41%). The results highlight absolute differences in central BP and pulse wave reflection between discrete laboratory and ambulatory conditions. The use of ambulatory measures of central BP and pulse wave reflection warrant further investigation for clinical prognostic value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.01.014","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118300196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Prior studies demonstrating clinical significance of noninvasive estimates of central blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave reflection have relied primarily on discrete resting measures. The aim of this study was to compare central BP and pulse wave reflection measures sampled during a single resting laboratory visit against those obtained under ambulatory conditions. The secondary aim was to investigate the reproducibility of ambulatory central BP and pulse wave reflection measurements. Forty healthy participants (21 males; 24 ± 3 years) completed three measurements of brachial artery pulse wave analysis (Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor Inside) in the laboratory followed by 24 hours of ambulatory monitoring. Seventeen participants repeated the 24-hour ambulatory monitoring visit after at least 1 week. Ambulatory measures were divided into daytime (9 AM–9 PM), nighttime (1 AM–6 AM), and 24-hour periods. Compared with laboratory measurements, central systolic BP, augmentation pressure, and augmentation index (with and without heart rate normalization) were higher (all P < .01) during daytime and 24-hour periods but lower during the nighttime period (all P < .001). The drop in nighttime brachial systolic BP was larger than central systolic pressure (Δ −20 ± 6 vs. −15 ± 6 mm Hg; P < .0001). Repeat ambulatory measurements of central BP and pulse wave reflection displayed good-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (r = 0.58–0.86; all P < .01), although measures of pulse wave reflection had higher coefficients of variation (14%–41%). The results highlight absolute differences in central BP and pulse wave reflection between discrete laboratory and ambulatory conditions. The use of ambulatory measures of central BP and pulse wave reflection warrant further investigation for clinical prognostic value.

中心血压和脉搏波反射的实验室测量与动态测量的比较:达到目标还是未达到目标?
先前的研究表明,无创中心血压(BP)和脉搏波反射的临床意义主要依赖于离散的静息测量。本研究的目的是比较在一次静息实验室访问期间采样的中央血压和脉搏波反射测量值与在流动条件下获得的测量值。第二个目的是研究动态中央血压和脉冲波反射测量的可重复性。40名健康参与者(21名男性;24±3年)在实验室完成3次肱动脉脉搏波分析(Oscar 2 with sphygmoor Inside),并进行24小时的动态监测。17名参与者在至少1周后重复了24小时的动态监测访问。流动测量分为白天(上午9点至晚上9点)、夜间(上午1点至6点)和24小时。与实验室测量值相比,中心收缩压、增强压和增强指数(心率恢复正常和未恢复正常)更高(P <.01),但夜间较低(所有P <措施)。夜间肱动脉收缩压下降幅度大于中枢收缩压(Δ - 20±6 vs - 15±6 mm Hg;P & lt;。)。重复动态测量中心血压和脉搏波反射显示出良好至优异的类内相关系数(r = 0.58-0.86;所有P <.01),尽管脉冲波反射的测量具有更高的变异系数(14%-41%)。结果突出了离散实验室和动态条件下中央血压和脉冲波反射的绝对差异。使用动态测量中心血压和脉搏波反射值得进一步研究临床预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信