Real world data in health technology assessments in kidney transplants in Germany: use of routinely collected data to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplants in the AMNOG process in Germany.

Q1 Medicine
GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2018-01-24 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000263
Kirsten H Herrmann, Ulf Meier-Kriesche, Aljoscha S Neubauer
{"title":"Real world data in health technology assessments in kidney transplants in Germany: use of routinely collected data to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplants in the AMNOG process in Germany.","authors":"Kirsten H Herrmann,&nbsp;Ulf Meier-Kriesche,&nbsp;Aljoscha S Neubauer","doi":"10.3205/000263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> It is discussed whether real world data can be used in health technology assessment. Following it is of interest whether routinely collected data for quality assurance (QA) in the hospital sector is feasible to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplantation in the AMNOG process in Germany. <b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the proportion of kidney transplants classified as from so-called standard criteria donors (SCD) and from expanded criteria donors (ECD) in Germany and to study the age distribution. <b>Methods:</b> After granted use by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), the data analysis was carried out by the AQUA institute, and a SPSS code was developed. Special challenge was the complex definition of SCD/ECD criteria that, in addition to donor age, takes into account combinations of donor diagnoses, creatinine, and cold ischemia time. <b>Results:</b> Age analyses could be performed in all patients. Median age of the adult transplant recipients in Germany was 54 years in 2012 as well as in 2013, range 18-85 and 18-82 years and a mean (SD) of 53 (14) and 52 (14) years, respectively. 63.5% (2012) and 62.5% (2013) of recipients were male. Classification in SCD/ECD transplants could be performed for 2,083 of 2,461 patients (85%; 2012) and for 1,795 of 2,079 patients (86%; 2013). Of all classifiable transplants 61.4% (2012) and 66.5% (2013) were SCD transplants. Total project time from the request to results was <6 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of data routinely collected for QA in the hospital sector is feasible to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplantation in the AMNOG process in Germany, which is basically following the systematic of an HTA process. All patients with kidney transplants are represented thus avoiding sampling error. Limitations include the availability of all necessary data in the QA data set. Within <6 months' time with reasonable resources it was possible to meet timelines. The analyses were accepted by the authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/000263","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: It is discussed whether real world data can be used in health technology assessment. Following it is of interest whether routinely collected data for quality assurance (QA) in the hospital sector is feasible to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplantation in the AMNOG process in Germany. Objectives: To investigate the proportion of kidney transplants classified as from so-called standard criteria donors (SCD) and from expanded criteria donors (ECD) in Germany and to study the age distribution. Methods: After granted use by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), the data analysis was carried out by the AQUA institute, and a SPSS code was developed. Special challenge was the complex definition of SCD/ECD criteria that, in addition to donor age, takes into account combinations of donor diagnoses, creatinine, and cold ischemia time. Results: Age analyses could be performed in all patients. Median age of the adult transplant recipients in Germany was 54 years in 2012 as well as in 2013, range 18-85 and 18-82 years and a mean (SD) of 53 (14) and 52 (14) years, respectively. 63.5% (2012) and 62.5% (2013) of recipients were male. Classification in SCD/ECD transplants could be performed for 2,083 of 2,461 patients (85%; 2012) and for 1,795 of 2,079 patients (86%; 2013). Of all classifiable transplants 61.4% (2012) and 66.5% (2013) were SCD transplants. Total project time from the request to results was <6 months. Conclusions: The use of data routinely collected for QA in the hospital sector is feasible to address epidemiologic questions in kidney transplantation in the AMNOG process in Germany, which is basically following the systematic of an HTA process. All patients with kidney transplants are represented thus avoiding sampling error. Limitations include the availability of all necessary data in the QA data set. Within <6 months' time with reasonable resources it was possible to meet timelines. The analyses were accepted by the authorities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国肾移植卫生技术评估中的真实世界数据:在德国AMNOG过程中使用常规收集的数据来解决肾移植的流行病学问题。
简介:讨论了现实世界的数据是否可以用于卫生技术评估。接下来,值得关注的是,在德国AMNOG过程中,医院部门例行收集的质量保证(QA)数据是否可行,以解决肾移植中的流行病学问题。目的:调查德国所谓标准供体(SCD)和扩大标准供体(ECD)肾移植的比例,并研究其年龄分布。方法:经联邦联合委员会(G-BA)批准使用后,由AQUA研究所进行数据分析,并编制SPSS代码。特殊的挑战是SCD/ECD标准的复杂定义,除了供体年龄,还要考虑供体诊断、肌酐和冷缺血时间的组合。结果:所有患者均可进行年龄分析。2012年和2013年德国成人移植受者的中位年龄为54岁,范围为18-85岁和18-82岁,平均(SD)分别为53(14)岁和52(14)岁。63.5%(2012年)和62.5%(2013年)为男性。2461例患者中有2083例(85%;2012年)和2079名患者中的1795名(86%;2013)。在所有可分类移植中,61.4%(2012年)和66.5%(2013年)为SCD移植。结论:在德国AMNOG过程中,使用医院部门例行收集的QA数据解决肾移植流行病学问题是可行的,该过程基本遵循HTA过程的系统。所有接受肾移植的患者均被纳入,从而避免了抽样误差。限制包括QA数据集中所有必要数据的可用性。在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书