Quality of death certificates in hospitals.

Archiv fur Kriminologie Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Ann Sophie Schröder, Jan Sperhake
{"title":"Quality of death certificates in hospitals.","authors":"Ann Sophie Schröder,&nbsp;Jan Sperhake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cause-of-death-statistics and the release of the body for burial depend primarily on the information contained in the death certificate. How to handle the death certificate has been critically discussed in professional circles again and again. A retrospective review of 1,315 deaths from six acute care hospitals in Germany was carried out with regard to the quality of the death certificates, taking into account information contained in the medical records. The review covered the readability of the death certificate, the quality of the epicrisis, misclassifications relating to the manner of death and the degree of certainty regarding the cause of death. In 93 % of cases (n= 1,221), death certificates were clearly legible. In about half the cases (43.3 %, n=569), the quality of the entries in the \"epicrisis\" section was good. In 45 % of cases (n= 592), no details were provided in the \"epicrisis \" section. In 3.9 % (n = 42) of deaths classified as natural, information was given indicating a non-natural death. Most of these deaths occurred in connection with a fall or an injury (n = 27) or possible errors relating to treatment or care (n = 7). Overall, the review showed that clinicians handled the medical death certificate in a competent and careful manner. However, based on the content of the files, the review identified individual and avoidable misclassifications as to the manner of death and improbable causes of death; it also demonstrated that information on the epicrisis is often missing and needs significant improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8171,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","volume":"238 5-6","pages":"198-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cause-of-death-statistics and the release of the body for burial depend primarily on the information contained in the death certificate. How to handle the death certificate has been critically discussed in professional circles again and again. A retrospective review of 1,315 deaths from six acute care hospitals in Germany was carried out with regard to the quality of the death certificates, taking into account information contained in the medical records. The review covered the readability of the death certificate, the quality of the epicrisis, misclassifications relating to the manner of death and the degree of certainty regarding the cause of death. In 93 % of cases (n= 1,221), death certificates were clearly legible. In about half the cases (43.3 %, n=569), the quality of the entries in the "epicrisis" section was good. In 45 % of cases (n= 592), no details were provided in the "epicrisis " section. In 3.9 % (n = 42) of deaths classified as natural, information was given indicating a non-natural death. Most of these deaths occurred in connection with a fall or an injury (n = 27) or possible errors relating to treatment or care (n = 7). Overall, the review showed that clinicians handled the medical death certificate in a competent and careful manner. However, based on the content of the files, the review identified individual and avoidable misclassifications as to the manner of death and improbable causes of death; it also demonstrated that information on the epicrisis is often missing and needs significant improvement.

医院死亡证明的质量。
死亡原因统计数字和尸体的交付埋葬主要取决于死亡证明中所载的信息。如何处理死亡证明,是专业人士一次又一次的批判性讨论。考虑到医疗记录中所载的信息,对德国6家急症医院的1 315例死亡进行了回顾性审查,以确定死亡证明的质量。审查的内容包括死亡证明的可读性、灾难的质量、与死亡方式有关的错误分类以及死亡原因的确定程度。在93%的病例(n= 1,221)中,死亡证明清晰可辨。在大约一半的病例中(43.3%,n=569),“epicrisis”部分的条目质量良好。在45%的病例(n= 592)中,没有在“epicrisis”部分提供详细信息。在归类为自然死亡的3.9% (n = 42)中,给出了表明非自然死亡的信息。这些死亡大多与跌倒或受伤(n = 27)或与治疗或护理有关的可能错误(n = 7)有关。总体而言,审查表明临床医生以称职和谨慎的方式处理医学死亡证明。然而,根据档案的内容,审查发现了个别的和可避免的关于死亡方式和不可能的死亡原因的错误分类;它还表明,关于地震的信息经常缺失,需要进行重大改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信