Intensive care nurses' assessment of pain in patients who are mechanically ventilated: How a pilot study helped to influence practice.

Frances Fothergill Bourbonnais, Sue Malone-Tucker, Debbie Dalton-Kischei
{"title":"Intensive care nurses' assessment of pain in patients who are mechanically ventilated: How a pilot study helped to influence practice.","authors":"Frances Fothergill Bourbonnais,&nbsp;Sue Malone-Tucker,&nbsp;Debbie Dalton-Kischei","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a common experience among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Many patients in ICUs have difficulty communicating their pain because of mechanical ventilation, and issues can arise when the nurse attempts to interpret the severity of pain,and work towards effective pain management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) as an assessment tool to be used by ICU nursing staff to assess pain in adult. patients who are mechanically ventilated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study was descriptive in design and employed both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data resulted from the CPOT scores obtained. In addition, a data collection sheet, developed by the authors, recorded sedation and analgesia used and interventions provided. This separate sheet was completed each time the CPOT was used. Nurses were asked to evaluate the CPOT using a Likert scale. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions related to using the CPOT Results. Twenty-three participants each assessed pain five times in a total of 23 patients using the CPOT over a 12-hour shift. Nurses stated the tool was easy to use and that it would be helpful to them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this pilot study contributed to the decision to implement the CPOT at the study ICUs. The systematic use of a tool may promote more goal-directed management of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"27 3","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is a common experience among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Many patients in ICUs have difficulty communicating their pain because of mechanical ventilation, and issues can arise when the nurse attempts to interpret the severity of pain,and work towards effective pain management.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) as an assessment tool to be used by ICU nursing staff to assess pain in adult. patients who are mechanically ventilated.

Methods: This pilot study was descriptive in design and employed both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data resulted from the CPOT scores obtained. In addition, a data collection sheet, developed by the authors, recorded sedation and analgesia used and interventions provided. This separate sheet was completed each time the CPOT was used. Nurses were asked to evaluate the CPOT using a Likert scale. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions related to using the CPOT Results. Twenty-three participants each assessed pain five times in a total of 23 patients using the CPOT over a 12-hour shift. Nurses stated the tool was easy to use and that it would be helpful to them.

Conclusion: The results of this pilot study contributed to the decision to implement the CPOT at the study ICUs. The systematic use of a tool may promote more goal-directed management of pain.

重症监护护士对机械通气患者疼痛的评估:一项初步研究如何影响实践。
背景:疼痛是重症监护病房(icu)患者的共同经历。由于机械通气,icu中的许多患者难以传达他们的疼痛,当护士试图解释疼痛的严重程度并努力实现有效的疼痛管理时,问题就会出现。目的:本研究的目的是确定重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)作为ICU护理人员评估成人疼痛的评估工具的适用性。需要机械通气的病人。方法:本初步研究采用描述性设计,采用定量和定性方法。定量数据来源于获得的CPOT分数。此外,由作者开发的数据收集表记录了使用的镇静和镇痛以及提供的干预措施。每次使用CPOT时,都要填写这张单独的表格。护士被要求用李克特量表评估CPOT。通过与使用CPOT结果相关的开放式问题收集定性数据。在12小时的轮班中,共有23名患者使用CPOT,其中23名参与者每人评估疼痛5次。护士表示,该工具易于使用,对他们有帮助。结论:这项初步研究的结果有助于在研究icu中实施CPOT的决定。系统地使用一种工具可能会促进更有目标的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信