Towards hope.

London journal of primary care Pub Date : 2017-12-20 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17571472.2017.1415188
Chris Manning
{"title":"Towards hope.","authors":"Chris Manning","doi":"10.1080/17571472.2017.1415188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LJPC is not so much a journal I would say. It is more like a movement that gives hope by championing and supporting a broad vision for health and care. It lifts our eyes beyond the single picture frame to view a whole gallery. It also provides opportunities to think freely and design systems and models of care that derive from the range of people’s needs and meet them, rather than simply describing and assessing focused aspects. Further, LJPC works with many different people’s views and experiences and, having valued them, comes up with comprehensive solutions; the words on its lips being ‘collaboration’ and ‘co-production’. As Gupta et al. enunciate in this issue: ‘Primary care can have an enhanced effect on the good mental health of the population by collaborating with others within local communities for health’. It is affirming to know that such collaboration also benefits the efficiency and health of those doing the collaborating [1]. The enhanced effects of collaborative working on individual practice reminds us that Governments and leaders of all kinds often devise strategy that does the opposite, exemplifying individual actions that can isolate and demotivate others. As John Donne famously wrote in 1624, ‘No man is an island entire of itself’.2 We are all interconnected, even if dividable, and policy should help to achieve strong, healthy inter-connections between people for the sake of the whole of society. Gupta et al. continue: ‘we hope that this paper will help general practice and more broadly, primary care, to take a strong role in developing this (force for whole-society health), in collaboration with public health, local authorities, healthcare and other organisations’. This aligns the paper to the increasing number of initiatives that enable collaboration, such as that being undertaken by The Health Foundation in its (UK Four Nation) Healthy Lives Strategy.3,4 Strategies are nothing without enactment. It is change that matters, beyond the words. LJPC has an important role to play here in supporting those who are committed to making a real difference in their own backyard. In the case of a GP, that means making a real difference to the person in front of them – one of the main duties and rewards of general practice McCartney highlights in this Issue of LJPC, general practices can fail in their duties when we fail to see patients in their full humanity and complexity and instead simply apply guidelines from medical science:","PeriodicalId":89823,"journal":{"name":"London journal of primary care","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17571472.2017.1415188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London journal of primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1415188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LJPC is not so much a journal I would say. It is more like a movement that gives hope by championing and supporting a broad vision for health and care. It lifts our eyes beyond the single picture frame to view a whole gallery. It also provides opportunities to think freely and design systems and models of care that derive from the range of people’s needs and meet them, rather than simply describing and assessing focused aspects. Further, LJPC works with many different people’s views and experiences and, having valued them, comes up with comprehensive solutions; the words on its lips being ‘collaboration’ and ‘co-production’. As Gupta et al. enunciate in this issue: ‘Primary care can have an enhanced effect on the good mental health of the population by collaborating with others within local communities for health’. It is affirming to know that such collaboration also benefits the efficiency and health of those doing the collaborating [1]. The enhanced effects of collaborative working on individual practice reminds us that Governments and leaders of all kinds often devise strategy that does the opposite, exemplifying individual actions that can isolate and demotivate others. As John Donne famously wrote in 1624, ‘No man is an island entire of itself’.2 We are all interconnected, even if dividable, and policy should help to achieve strong, healthy inter-connections between people for the sake of the whole of society. Gupta et al. continue: ‘we hope that this paper will help general practice and more broadly, primary care, to take a strong role in developing this (force for whole-society health), in collaboration with public health, local authorities, healthcare and other organisations’. This aligns the paper to the increasing number of initiatives that enable collaboration, such as that being undertaken by The Health Foundation in its (UK Four Nation) Healthy Lives Strategy.3,4 Strategies are nothing without enactment. It is change that matters, beyond the words. LJPC has an important role to play here in supporting those who are committed to making a real difference in their own backyard. In the case of a GP, that means making a real difference to the person in front of them – one of the main duties and rewards of general practice McCartney highlights in this Issue of LJPC, general practices can fail in their duties when we fail to see patients in their full humanity and complexity and instead simply apply guidelines from medical science:
走向希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书