John Woolman and Ethical Progress in Kitcher's Pragmatic Naturalism.

The Journal of psychohistory Pub Date : 2017-01-01
John Barresi
{"title":"John Woolman and Ethical Progress in Kitcher's Pragmatic Naturalism.","authors":"John Barresi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of John Woolman’s views on slavery plays an important evidentiary role in Philip Kitcher’s recent book, The ethical project (Kitcher 2011). In this work Kitcher takes what he calls a “pragmatic naturalist” approach to ethics and claims that the discovery of ethical truth plays no role in the emergence of ethical progress. To support his view, he argues that Woolman’s contribution was not due to his discovery of an ethical truth about slavery, not previously known, but due to his sensitivity to slavery and his influence on others, which contributed to collective progressive change in moral norms involving slavery. While not disputing Kitcher’s ethical theory, I argue that personal discoveries of a moral psychological nature made by Woolman served both as insights and motivations for his contribution. Thus, even if there are no such things as independent ethical truths that can be discovered by individuals, a fully naturalistic approach to ethical progress requires that we make room not only for group-level progressive evolution of norms, but also for individual discoveries of a moral psychological nature that can sometimes cause an individual to play a significant initiating role in progressive ethical transitions that occur at a group level.</p>","PeriodicalId":83132,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of psychohistory","volume":"44 3","pages":"200-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of psychohistory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of John Woolman’s views on slavery plays an important evidentiary role in Philip Kitcher’s recent book, The ethical project (Kitcher 2011). In this work Kitcher takes what he calls a “pragmatic naturalist” approach to ethics and claims that the discovery of ethical truth plays no role in the emergence of ethical progress. To support his view, he argues that Woolman’s contribution was not due to his discovery of an ethical truth about slavery, not previously known, but due to his sensitivity to slavery and his influence on others, which contributed to collective progressive change in moral norms involving slavery. While not disputing Kitcher’s ethical theory, I argue that personal discoveries of a moral psychological nature made by Woolman served both as insights and motivations for his contribution. Thus, even if there are no such things as independent ethical truths that can be discovered by individuals, a fully naturalistic approach to ethical progress requires that we make room not only for group-level progressive evolution of norms, but also for individual discoveries of a moral psychological nature that can sometimes cause an individual to play a significant initiating role in progressive ethical transitions that occur at a group level.

约翰·伍尔曼与基彻实用主义自然主义的伦理进步。
约翰·伍尔曼关于奴隶制观点的发展在菲利普·基彻的新书《伦理工程》(Kitcher 2011)中发挥了重要的证据作用。在这部作品中,Kitcher采用了他所谓的“实用主义自然主义”的伦理方法,并声称伦理真理的发现在伦理进步的出现中没有任何作用。为了支持他的观点,他认为伍尔曼的贡献不是因为他发现了一个关于奴隶制的道德真理,这是以前不知道的,而是因为他对奴隶制的敏感性和他对他人的影响,这有助于奴隶制的道德规范的集体进步变化。虽然不反对Kitcher的伦理理论,但我认为伍尔曼对道德心理本质的个人发现既是他贡献的洞察力和动机。因此,即使不存在个体可以发现的独立的伦理真理这样的东西,一个完全自然主义的伦理进步方法要求我们不仅要为群体层面规范的进步进化腾出空间,还要为道德心理本质的个人发现腾出空间,这种发现有时会导致个人在群体层面上发生的进步伦理转变中发挥重要的初始作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信