Dietary Patterns and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Review of 17 Years of Evidence (2000-2016).

Q3 Medicine
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s11888-017-0390-5
Fred K Tabung, Lisa S Brown, Teresa T Fung
{"title":"Dietary Patterns and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Review of 17 Years of Evidence (2000-2016).","authors":"Fred K Tabung, Lisa S Brown, Teresa T Fung","doi":"10.1007/s11888-017-0390-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global public health problem, with an estimated 1.4 million cases diagnosed worldwide in 2012. Evidence suggests that diet may be important for primary prevention.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The 2017 WCRF/AICR Continuous Update Project on colorectal cancer concluded that there is convincing evidence linking several individual dietary factors with CRC risk but the evidence for dietary patterns was limited and inconclusive. Also, previous reviews and meta-analyses have not critically synthesized various dietary patterns. This review synthesized data from dietary patterns studies over a 17-year period from 2000 to 2016.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We included 49 studies (28 cohort and 21 case-control) that examined the association of index-based and empirically-derived dietary patterns and CRC risk. A synthesis of food group components comprising the different index-based and empirically-derived patterns revealed two distinct dietary patterns associated with CRC risk. A \"healthy\" pattern, generally characterized by high intake of fruits and vegetables, wholegrains, nuts and legumes, fish and other seafood, milk and other dairy products, was associated with lower CRC risk. In contrast, the \"unhealthy\" pattern, characterized by high intakes of red meat, processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, desserts and potatoes was associated with higher CRC risk. It is notable that the number of food groups, the intake quantity, the exact types of foods in each food group, differed between populations, yet the two dietary patterns remained consistent across regions, especially in empirically-derived patterns, an indication of the high reproducibility of these patterns. However, findings for CRC risk in both index-based and empirically-derived patterns, differed by sex, with stronger associations among men than women; study design, a higher proportion of case-control studies reported significant findings compared to prospective studies. Consuming a dietary pattern high in fruits and vegetables and low in meats and sweets is protective against CRC risk. However, important questions remain about mechanisms underlying differences by sex; life-course timing of exposure to dietary patterns; interaction of dietary patterns with the microbiome or with lifestyle factors including physical activity; and elucidation of subsite differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":45986,"journal":{"name":"Current Colorectal Cancer Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5794031/pdf/nihms913811.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Colorectal Cancer Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-017-0390-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global public health problem, with an estimated 1.4 million cases diagnosed worldwide in 2012. Evidence suggests that diet may be important for primary prevention.

Recent findings: The 2017 WCRF/AICR Continuous Update Project on colorectal cancer concluded that there is convincing evidence linking several individual dietary factors with CRC risk but the evidence for dietary patterns was limited and inconclusive. Also, previous reviews and meta-analyses have not critically synthesized various dietary patterns. This review synthesized data from dietary patterns studies over a 17-year period from 2000 to 2016.

Summary: We included 49 studies (28 cohort and 21 case-control) that examined the association of index-based and empirically-derived dietary patterns and CRC risk. A synthesis of food group components comprising the different index-based and empirically-derived patterns revealed two distinct dietary patterns associated with CRC risk. A "healthy" pattern, generally characterized by high intake of fruits and vegetables, wholegrains, nuts and legumes, fish and other seafood, milk and other dairy products, was associated with lower CRC risk. In contrast, the "unhealthy" pattern, characterized by high intakes of red meat, processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, desserts and potatoes was associated with higher CRC risk. It is notable that the number of food groups, the intake quantity, the exact types of foods in each food group, differed between populations, yet the two dietary patterns remained consistent across regions, especially in empirically-derived patterns, an indication of the high reproducibility of these patterns. However, findings for CRC risk in both index-based and empirically-derived patterns, differed by sex, with stronger associations among men than women; study design, a higher proportion of case-control studies reported significant findings compared to prospective studies. Consuming a dietary pattern high in fruits and vegetables and low in meats and sweets is protective against CRC risk. However, important questions remain about mechanisms underlying differences by sex; life-course timing of exposure to dietary patterns; interaction of dietary patterns with the microbiome or with lifestyle factors including physical activity; and elucidation of subsite differences.

Abstract Image

膳食模式与结直肠癌风险:17 年证据回顾(2000-2016 年)》。
审查目的:结直肠癌(CRC)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,2012 年全球确诊病例约为 140 万例。有证据表明,饮食对于初级预防可能很重要:2017 年世界癌症研究基金会/AICR 大肠癌持续更新项目得出结论:有令人信服的证据表明,一些个体饮食因素与 CRC 风险有关,但有关饮食模式的证据有限且不确定。此外,以往的综述和荟萃分析并未对各种膳食模式进行批判性综合。本综述综合了 2000 年至 2016 年 17 年间的膳食模式研究数据。摘要:我们纳入了 49 项研究(28 项队列研究和 21 项病例对照研究),这些研究考察了基于指数和经验衍生的膳食模式与 CRC 风险之间的关联。对构成不同指数型和经验型膳食模式的食物组成分进行综合分析后发现,有两种不同的膳食模式与 CRC 风险有关。健康 "的膳食模式通常以水果和蔬菜、全谷物、坚果和豆类、鱼类和其他海产品、牛奶和其他乳制品的高摄入量为特征,与较低的 CRC 风险相关。相比之下,以红肉、加工肉类、含糖饮料、精制谷物、甜点和土豆摄入量高为特征的 "不健康 "模式与较高的 CRC 风险相关。值得注意的是,不同人群的食物类别数量、摄入量以及每个食物类别中的具体食物类型都不尽相同,但这两种膳食模式在不同地区仍保持一致,尤其是在根据经验得出的模式中,这表明这些模式具有很高的可重复性。然而,在基于指数的膳食模式和根据经验得出的膳食模式中,有关 CRC 风险的研究结果因性别而异,男性的相关性强于女性;在研究设计方面,与前瞻性研究相比,病例对照研究报告的重大发现比例更高。多吃水果和蔬菜、少吃肉类和甜食的膳食模式可降低 CRC 风险。然而,在以下方面仍存在重要问题:性别差异的内在机制;暴露于膳食模式的生命历程时间;膳食模式与微生物组或包括体育锻炼在内的生活方式因素的相互作用;以及阐明亚部位差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of colorectal cancer. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those with the disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and emerging therapeutic approaches and the molecular basis of disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信