Biomechanics of Lumbar Motion-Segments in Dynamic Compression.

Q2 Medicine
Mike W J Arun, Prasannaah Hadagali, Klaus Driesslein, William Curry, Narayan Yoganandan, Frank A Pintar
{"title":"Biomechanics of Lumbar Motion-Segments in Dynamic Compression.","authors":"Mike W J Arun,&nbsp;Prasannaah Hadagali,&nbsp;Klaus Driesslein,&nbsp;William Curry,&nbsp;Narayan Yoganandan,&nbsp;Frank A Pintar","doi":"10.4271/2017-22-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent epidemiology studies have reported increase in lumbar spine injuries in frontal crashes. Whole human body finite element models (FEHBM) are frequently used to delineate mechanisms of such injuries. However, the accuracy of these models in mimicking the response of human spine relies on the characterization data of the spine model. The current study set out to generate characterization data that can be input to FEHBM lumbar spine, to obtain biofidelic responses from the models. Twenty-five lumbar functional spinal units were tested under compressive loading. A hydraulic testing machine was used to load the superior ends of the specimens. A 75N load was placed on the superior PMMA to remove the laxity in the joint and mimic the physiological load. There were three loading sequences, namely, preconditioning, 0.5 m/s (non-injurious) and 1.0 m/s (failure). Forces and displacements were collected using six-axis load cell and VICON targets. In addition, acoustic signals were collected to identify the times of failures. Finally, response corridors were generated for the two speeds. To demonstrate the corridors, GHBMC FE model was simulated in frontal impact condition with the default and updated lumbar stiffness. Bi-linear trend was observed in the force versus displacement plots. In the 0.5 m/s tests, mean toe- and linear-region stiffnesses were 0.96±0.37 and 2.44±0.92 kN/mm. In 1.0 m/s tests, the toe and linear-region stiffnesses were 1.13±0.56 and 4.6±2.5 kN/mm. Lumbar joints demonstrated 2.5 times higher stiffness in the linear-region when the loading rate was increased by 0.5 m/s.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"61 ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-22-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Recent epidemiology studies have reported increase in lumbar spine injuries in frontal crashes. Whole human body finite element models (FEHBM) are frequently used to delineate mechanisms of such injuries. However, the accuracy of these models in mimicking the response of human spine relies on the characterization data of the spine model. The current study set out to generate characterization data that can be input to FEHBM lumbar spine, to obtain biofidelic responses from the models. Twenty-five lumbar functional spinal units were tested under compressive loading. A hydraulic testing machine was used to load the superior ends of the specimens. A 75N load was placed on the superior PMMA to remove the laxity in the joint and mimic the physiological load. There were three loading sequences, namely, preconditioning, 0.5 m/s (non-injurious) and 1.0 m/s (failure). Forces and displacements were collected using six-axis load cell and VICON targets. In addition, acoustic signals were collected to identify the times of failures. Finally, response corridors were generated for the two speeds. To demonstrate the corridors, GHBMC FE model was simulated in frontal impact condition with the default and updated lumbar stiffness. Bi-linear trend was observed in the force versus displacement plots. In the 0.5 m/s tests, mean toe- and linear-region stiffnesses were 0.96±0.37 and 2.44±0.92 kN/mm. In 1.0 m/s tests, the toe and linear-region stiffnesses were 1.13±0.56 and 4.6±2.5 kN/mm. Lumbar joints demonstrated 2.5 times higher stiffness in the linear-region when the loading rate was increased by 0.5 m/s.

动态压缩腰椎运动节段的生物力学。
最近的流行病学研究报告了前部碰撞中腰椎损伤的增加。整个人体有限元模型(FEHBM)经常被用来描述这种损伤的机制。然而,这些模型在模拟人类脊柱反应时的准确性依赖于脊柱模型的表征数据。目前的研究旨在生成可输入FEHBM腰椎的特征数据,以从模型中获得生物特异性反应。在压缩载荷下测试了25个腰椎功能脊柱单元。采用水力试验机对试件上端进行加载。在上部PMMA上施加75N的载荷以消除关节松弛并模拟生理载荷。加载顺序分别为预处理、0.5 m/s(无损伤)和1.0 m/s(失效)。使用六轴称重传感器和VICON靶收集力和位移。此外,还收集了声信号来识别故障次数。最后,为两种速度生成响应走廊。为了证明这些通道,在正面碰撞条件下,采用默认和更新的腰椎刚度模拟了GHBMC FE模型。在力-位移图中观察到双线性趋势。在0.5 m/s的测试中,脚趾和线性区域的平均刚度分别为0.96±0.37和2.44±0.92 kN/mm。在1.0 m/s试验中,趾部和线性区域刚度分别为1.13±0.56和4.6±2.5 kN/mm。加载速率每增加0.5 m/s,腰椎关节线性区刚度提高2.5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信