Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis.

IF 5.2 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2016-04-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PTT.S68869
Tessa Hanley, Marc Handford, Dawn Lavery, Zenas Zn Yiu
{"title":"Assessment and monitoring of biologic drug adverse events in patients with psoriasis.","authors":"Tessa Hanley,&nbsp;Marc Handford,&nbsp;Dawn Lavery,&nbsp;Zenas Zn Yiu","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S68869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current treatment guidelines for biologic therapies in psoriasis differ in their recommendation for the monitoring of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to draw together evidence from the currently available guidelines as a summary of how biologics licensed for the treatment of psoriasis should be monitored for adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE database was searched to identity the current literature on the safety and screening guidance associated with infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study was limited by the lack of data evaluating monitoring in patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with a biologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review of the current literature highlights that there are areas of routine screening, which are recommended in current practice, which require further evidence to investigate its true utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most screening and monitoring tests performed routinely in clinical practice are supported by minimal clinical evidence, highlighting the need for more studies to evaluate the role and value of the different modalities of screening and monitoring for adverse events in those with psoriasis receiving treatment with biologic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74589,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/PTT.S68869","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S68869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Current treatment guidelines for biologic therapies in psoriasis differ in their recommendation for the monitoring of adverse events.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to draw together evidence from the currently available guidelines as a summary of how biologics licensed for the treatment of psoriasis should be monitored for adverse events.

Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched to identity the current literature on the safety and screening guidance associated with infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.

Limitations: This study was limited by the lack of data evaluating monitoring in patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with a biologic therapy.

Results: This review of the current literature highlights that there are areas of routine screening, which are recommended in current practice, which require further evidence to investigate its true utility.

Conclusion: Most screening and monitoring tests performed routinely in clinical practice are supported by minimal clinical evidence, highlighting the need for more studies to evaluate the role and value of the different modalities of screening and monitoring for adverse events in those with psoriasis receiving treatment with biologic therapies.

Abstract Image

银屑病患者生物药物不良事件的评估与监测。
背景:目前银屑病生物治疗指南对不良事件监测的建议存在差异。目的:本文的目的是从目前可用的指南中收集证据,总结如何监测用于治疗牛皮癣的生物制剂的不良事件。方法:检索MEDLINE数据库,以确定目前有关英夫利昔单抗、依那西普、阿达木单抗、乌斯特金单抗和secukinumab的安全性和筛选指南的文献。局限性:由于缺乏对银屑病患者进行生物治疗的监测评估数据,本研究受到限制。结果:对现有文献的回顾强调了常规筛查的一些领域,这些领域在目前的实践中是推荐的,但需要进一步的证据来调查其真正的效用。结论:在临床实践中,大多数常规筛查和监测试验都缺乏临床证据的支持,因此需要更多的研究来评估在接受生物治疗的银屑病患者中,不同方式的筛查和监测不良事件的作用和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信