Central neck dissection via the transoral approach.

Annals of thyroid Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-31 DOI:10.21037/aot.2017.10.02
Christopher R Razavi, Akeweh Fondong, Ralph P Tufano, Jonathon O Russell
{"title":"Central neck dissection via the transoral approach.","authors":"Christopher R Razavi,&nbsp;Akeweh Fondong,&nbsp;Ralph P Tufano,&nbsp;Jonathon O Russell","doi":"10.21037/aot.2017.10.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been a strong impetus for the development of remote access approaches to the central neck. The primary motivation for this has been to alleviate the negative impact that some patients may perceive from a central neck scar. Numerous approaches have been described; however the only approach that provides midline access and equivalent visualization of the bilateral thyroid lobes and paratracheal basins is transoral neck surgery (TONS). TONS has been shown to be safe and effective in performing thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and central neck dissection (CND) via both the endoscopic and robotic techniques. In contrast with other remote access techniques, it provides the surgeon with familiar views of the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) at their insertion site in concert with equivalent access to both paratracheal basins, thus uniquely facilitating safe and comprehensive CND. Though feasible and safe, CND via TONS is not appropriate in all cases. CND via TONS should only be performed with concomitant transoral total thyroidectomy, either prophylactically if the surgeon routinely performs prophylactic CND, or therapeutically if there is newly found evidence of nodal metastasis in the central compartment at the time of surgery. We base these recommendations on both the recent American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) consensus statement for indications for transcervical CND and the baseline indications for TONS.</p>","PeriodicalId":92168,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thyroid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/aot.2017.10.02","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aot.2017.10.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

There has been a strong impetus for the development of remote access approaches to the central neck. The primary motivation for this has been to alleviate the negative impact that some patients may perceive from a central neck scar. Numerous approaches have been described; however the only approach that provides midline access and equivalent visualization of the bilateral thyroid lobes and paratracheal basins is transoral neck surgery (TONS). TONS has been shown to be safe and effective in performing thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and central neck dissection (CND) via both the endoscopic and robotic techniques. In contrast with other remote access techniques, it provides the surgeon with familiar views of the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) at their insertion site in concert with equivalent access to both paratracheal basins, thus uniquely facilitating safe and comprehensive CND. Though feasible and safe, CND via TONS is not appropriate in all cases. CND via TONS should only be performed with concomitant transoral total thyroidectomy, either prophylactically if the surgeon routinely performs prophylactic CND, or therapeutically if there is newly found evidence of nodal metastasis in the central compartment at the time of surgery. We base these recommendations on both the recent American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) consensus statement for indications for transcervical CND and the baseline indications for TONS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经口入路中央颈部清扫术。
有一股强大的动力推动了对中央颈部的远程访问方法的发展。这样做的主要动机是为了减轻一些患者可能感受到的颈部中心疤痕的负面影响。已经描述了许多方法;然而,唯一能提供中线通路和双侧甲状腺叶和气管旁盆腔等效可视化的方法是经口颈部手术(TONS)。通过内窥镜和机器人技术,TONS已被证明在甲状腺切除术、甲状旁腺切除术和中央颈部清扫术(CND)中安全有效。与其他远程进入技术相比,它为外科医生提供了双侧喉返神经(RLN)插入部位的熟悉视图,同时也提供了对两个气管旁盆地的同等进入,从而独特地促进了安全和全面的CND。虽然可行和安全,但并非在所有情况下都适用通过ton进行CND。经TONS行CND只能同时行经口全甲状腺切除术,如果外科医生常规行预防性CND,则可采取预防性措施;如果手术时新发现中央腔室淋巴结转移,则可采取治疗性措施。我们的建议基于最近美国头颈学会(AHNS)关于经宫颈CND适应症的共识声明和TONS的基线适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信