Comprehensive Approach to Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis by Enteric Microorganisms. Comparison Between Single Organism and Polymicrobial Infections.
Roi Ribera-Sánchez, Miguel Pérez-Fontán, Antía López-Iglesias, Alba García-Enríquez, Ana Rodríguez-Carmona
{"title":"Comprehensive Approach to Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis by Enteric Microorganisms. Comparison Between Single Organism and Polymicrobial Infections.","authors":"Roi Ribera-Sánchez, Miguel Pérez-Fontán, Antía López-Iglesias, Alba García-Enríquez, Ana Rodríguez-Carmona","doi":"10.3747/pdi.2017.00184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peritoneal infections of enteric origin (EntP) have been classically investigated using partial strategies, focused on particular subgroups of microorganisms. A more comprehensive approach may facilitate the definition of the nomenclature and clinical presentation of these infections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the clinical presentation and outcomes of a full spectrum of EntP, with a particular interest in the comparison between single-organism and polymicrobial infections.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following an observational design, we investigated 165 single-organism and 83 polymicrobial peritonitis episodes with isolation of at least 1 enteric bacteria (<i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. and/or intestinal anaerobics). We compared the risk of treatment failure for these 2 types of infection and explored the significance of the isolation of specific microorganisms and of their antibacterial susceptibility patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polymicrobial EntP was associated with higher rates of hospitalization, more changes to initial antibiotic therapy, more surgical explorations, and higher mortality and treatment failure rates than monobacterial EntP. However, stratified and multivariate analyses revealed that the burden of these differences rested on the isolation of intestinal anaerobics (odds ratio [OR] 12.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-31.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and/or <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.02-11.30, <i>p</i> = 0.046), while other polymicrobial infections were more comparable with single-organism peritonitis, except for even higher mortality rates in the former group. Lower antibiotic susceptibility of the isolations (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.51-2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.70) did not perform as a predictor of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive approach to peritoneal infections by intestinal microorganisms may provide a focused perspective of the clinical presentation and outcomes of these complications of peritoneal dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3747/pdi.2017.00184","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2017.00184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal infections of enteric origin (EntP) have been classically investigated using partial strategies, focused on particular subgroups of microorganisms. A more comprehensive approach may facilitate the definition of the nomenclature and clinical presentation of these infections.
Objectives: To investigate the clinical presentation and outcomes of a full spectrum of EntP, with a particular interest in the comparison between single-organism and polymicrobial infections.
Method: Following an observational design, we investigated 165 single-organism and 83 polymicrobial peritonitis episodes with isolation of at least 1 enteric bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus spp. and/or intestinal anaerobics). We compared the risk of treatment failure for these 2 types of infection and explored the significance of the isolation of specific microorganisms and of their antibacterial susceptibility patterns.
Results: Polymicrobial EntP was associated with higher rates of hospitalization, more changes to initial antibiotic therapy, more surgical explorations, and higher mortality and treatment failure rates than monobacterial EntP. However, stratified and multivariate analyses revealed that the burden of these differences rested on the isolation of intestinal anaerobics (odds ratio [OR] 12.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-31.09, p < 0.001) and/or Enterococcus faecium (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.02-11.30, p = 0.046), while other polymicrobial infections were more comparable with single-organism peritonitis, except for even higher mortality rates in the former group. Lower antibiotic susceptibility of the isolations (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.51-2.70, p = 0.70) did not perform as a predictor of treatment failure.
Conclusion: A comprehensive approach to peritoneal infections by intestinal microorganisms may provide a focused perspective of the clinical presentation and outcomes of these complications of peritoneal dialysis.
背景:肠源性腹膜感染(EntP)的传统研究采用局部策略,重点关注特定的微生物亚群。更全面的方法可能有助于这些感染的命名和临床表现的定义。目的:研究全谱EntP的临床表现和结果,特别对单生物和多微生物感染的比较感兴趣。方法:采用观察设计,研究了165例单菌腹膜炎和83例多菌腹膜炎,分离出至少1种肠道细菌(肠杆菌科、肠球菌和/或肠道厌氧菌)。我们比较了这两种感染的治疗失败风险,并探讨了分离特定微生物及其抗菌药敏模式的意义。结果:与单菌EntP相比,多微生物EntP与更高的住院率、更多的初始抗生素治疗改变、更多的手术探索、更高的死亡率和治疗失败率相关。然而,分层和多变量分析显示,这些差异的负担取决于肠道厌氧菌的分离(优势比[OR] 12.05, 95%可信区间[CI] 2.53-31.09, p < 0.001)和/或屎肠球菌(OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.02-11.30, p = 0.046),而其他多微生物感染与单微生物腹膜炎更具可比性,除了前者的死亡率更高。分离物较低的抗生素敏感性(OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.51-2.70, p = 0.70)不能作为治疗失败的预测因子。结论:对肠道微生物引起的腹膜感染进行综合研究,可以为腹膜透析并发症的临床表现和预后提供一个有针对性的视角。