Comparison of Patient Outcome Measures between a Traditional Teaching Hospitalist Service and a Non-Teaching Hospitalist Service at an Academic Children's Hospital.

Tony R Tarchichi, Jessica Garrison, Kwonho Jeong, Anthony Fabio
{"title":"Comparison of Patient Outcome Measures between a Traditional Teaching Hospitalist Service and a Non-Teaching Hospitalist Service at an Academic Children's Hospital.","authors":"Tony R Tarchichi,&nbsp;Jessica Garrison,&nbsp;Kwonho Jeong,&nbsp;Anthony Fabio","doi":"10.4172/2161-0665.1000336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Inpatient pediatric care is increasingly provided by pediatric hospitalists. This, in addition to changes in resident duty hour restrictions, has led to the creation of new models of care for inpatient pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to compare traditional outcome measures between a pediatric hospitalist-only service and a more traditional academic service in which care was provided by pediatric hospitalists, residents, and medical students. Attending physicians on the hospitalist-only service had an average of 1.7 years of post-residency experience compared to an average 16 years of experience for those working on the traditional academic service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study (hospitalist-only v. teaching service) used electronic medical records data of patients (n=1,059) admitted to a quaternary care, academic, children's hospital in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania with diagnoses of bronchiolitis, viral syndrome, and gastroenteritis from July 2011 to June 2014. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis admitted to the hospitalist-only service had a significantly higher severity-of-illness-score than those admitted to the teaching service. A decreased length of stay and lower hospital costs were seen for patients admitted to the hospitalist-only service; however, these differences did not reach a level of statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures of patients with common pediatric illnesses admitted to a hospitalist-only versus a teaching hospitalist service. The model of a hospitalist-only service staffed by recent residency graduates may provide an efficient and effective model of care as patients admitted to this service had similar outcome measures to those patients cared for by more-experienced attending physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":91373,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0665.1000336","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and objectives: Inpatient pediatric care is increasingly provided by pediatric hospitalists. This, in addition to changes in resident duty hour restrictions, has led to the creation of new models of care for inpatient pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to compare traditional outcome measures between a pediatric hospitalist-only service and a more traditional academic service in which care was provided by pediatric hospitalists, residents, and medical students. Attending physicians on the hospitalist-only service had an average of 1.7 years of post-residency experience compared to an average 16 years of experience for those working on the traditional academic service.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study (hospitalist-only v. teaching service) used electronic medical records data of patients (n=1,059) admitted to a quaternary care, academic, children's hospital in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania with diagnoses of bronchiolitis, viral syndrome, and gastroenteritis from July 2011 to June 2014. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission rates.

Results: Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis admitted to the hospitalist-only service had a significantly higher severity-of-illness-score than those admitted to the teaching service. A decreased length of stay and lower hospital costs were seen for patients admitted to the hospitalist-only service; however, these differences did not reach a level of statistical significance.

Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures of patients with common pediatric illnesses admitted to a hospitalist-only versus a teaching hospitalist service. The model of a hospitalist-only service staffed by recent residency graduates may provide an efficient and effective model of care as patients admitted to this service had similar outcome measures to those patients cared for by more-experienced attending physicians.

某学院型儿童医院传统教学医院服务与非教学医院服务患者预后指标的比较
背景和目的:儿科住院治疗越来越多地由儿科医院医生提供。这一点,加上住院医生值班时间限制的变化,导致了儿科住院病人护理新模式的创建。本研究的目的是比较仅儿科医院医生提供的服务和由儿科医院医生、住院医生和医学生提供的更为传统的学术服务之间的传统结果测量。住院医师服务的主治医生平均有1.7年的住院医师实习经验,而传统学术服务的主治医生平均有16年的实习经验。方法:这项回顾性队列研究(仅住院医师与教学服务)使用了2011年7月至2014年6月在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡一家第四保健、学术、儿童医院就诊的诊断为细支气管炎、病毒综合征和胃肠炎的患者(n= 1059)的电子病历数据。主要结局指标包括住院时间、住院费用和再入院率。结果:被诊断为毛细支气管炎的患者接受住院医师服务的疾病严重程度评分明显高于接受教学服务的患者。只接受住院医生服务的病人住院时间缩短,住院费用降低;然而,这些差异并没有达到统计学意义的水平。结论:普通儿科疾病患者在住院治疗和教学住院治疗的结果测量上没有统计学上的显著差异。仅由住院医师提供服务的模式可能提供一种高效的护理模式,因为接受这种服务的患者与那些由更有经验的主治医生照顾的患者有相似的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信