Prospective HIV Clinical Trial Comparison by Expected Kullback-Leibler Divergence.

LaMont Cannon, Cesar Augusto Vargas Garcia, Michael J Piovoso, Ryan Zurakowski
{"title":"Prospective HIV Clinical Trial Comparison by Expected Kullback-Leibler Divergence.","authors":"LaMont Cannon,&nbsp;Cesar Augusto Vargas Garcia,&nbsp;Michael J Piovoso,&nbsp;Ryan Zurakowski","doi":"10.1109/ACC.2016.7525096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sample frequency and volume of blood that can be drawn from a single patient is meticulously restricted under the human subject protection protocols established by an institutional review board (IRB). Consequently, the amount of samples that can be taken during a particular experiment is limited. In order to ensure an effective experiment design, considerations must be taken choosing when to take patient samples. A validated model of HIV-1 viral replication and 2-LTR production is exploited to find sub-optimal sampling schedules that maximize information content of the experiment outcome. This is done through a Forward Stepwise Regression (FSR) process with Kullback Liebler Divergence (KLD) as a selection criterion. Suboptimal schedules are found for an experiment taking four sample points over a possible span of 20 weeks. All schedules found with the FSR process contain significantly more information than both a uniform schedule and a schedule used in a previous experiment with 4 sample points. This work demonstrates the advantages of using KLD as a tool in the experiment design process to increase information content.</p>","PeriodicalId":74510,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference","volume":"2016 ","pages":"1295-1300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525096","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The sample frequency and volume of blood that can be drawn from a single patient is meticulously restricted under the human subject protection protocols established by an institutional review board (IRB). Consequently, the amount of samples that can be taken during a particular experiment is limited. In order to ensure an effective experiment design, considerations must be taken choosing when to take patient samples. A validated model of HIV-1 viral replication and 2-LTR production is exploited to find sub-optimal sampling schedules that maximize information content of the experiment outcome. This is done through a Forward Stepwise Regression (FSR) process with Kullback Liebler Divergence (KLD) as a selection criterion. Suboptimal schedules are found for an experiment taking four sample points over a possible span of 20 weeks. All schedules found with the FSR process contain significantly more information than both a uniform schedule and a schedule used in a previous experiment with 4 sample points. This work demonstrates the advantages of using KLD as a tool in the experiment design process to increase information content.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预期Kullback-Leibler差异对HIV临床试验的前瞻性比较
根据机构审查委员会(IRB)制定的人体受试者保护协议,可以从单个患者身上抽取的血样频率和血液量受到严格限制。因此,在一个特定的实验中可以采取的样品数量是有限的。为了确保有效的实验设计,必须考虑在何时采集患者样本。一个经过验证的HIV-1病毒复制和2-LTR生产模型被用来寻找次优采样计划,以最大化实验结果的信息内容。这是通过以Kullback Liebler散度(KLD)作为选择标准的前向逐步回归(FSR)过程完成的。对于在可能的20周的时间跨度内采用四个采样点的实验,发现次优时间表。在FSR过程中发现的所有时间表都比统一时间表和先前4个样本点实验中使用的时间表包含更多的信息。这项工作证明了在实验设计过程中使用KLD作为工具来增加信息内容的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信