The Cost-effectiveness of the Online MindSpot Clinic for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Australia.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Yu-Chen Lee, Lan Gao, Blake F Dear, Nickolai Titov, Cathrine Mihalopoulos
{"title":"The Cost-effectiveness of the Online MindSpot Clinic for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Australia.","authors":"Yu-Chen Lee,&nbsp;Lan Gao,&nbsp;Blake F Dear,&nbsp;Nickolai Titov,&nbsp;Cathrine Mihalopoulos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The MindSpot Clinic (MindSpot) offers internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) courses for people with anxiety and depressive disorders in Australia. The efficacy credentials of the courses offered at MindSpot are now well established but not the credentials of cost-effectiveness. The current study is aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Wellbeing Course offered in MindSpot in comparison with the routine/usual care (defined as care in the absence of MindSpot) for people with symptoms of depression or/and anxiety from the perspective of Australian Department of Health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An economic model using a one-year decision-tree framework was constructed. The four health states in the model included: fully recovered; partially recovered; no improvement; and deteriorated. The probabilities between the four health states in the model were derived from a series of individual client datasets and from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. The EuroQol Five Dimension -- Five Level was used to derive the utilities, and costs were expressed in 2014 Australian dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of results to key model parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case analysis, for people seeking treatment, care offered at Mindspot cost less and achieved greater benefits compared to the comparator. By adopting MindSpot, an additional 505 of fully recovered and 223 of partially recovered clients can be achieved per annum compared to routine/usual care. The result of the sensitivity analyses indicated the result of the analysis were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the iCBT treatments provided by MindSpot were highly cost-effective in comparison with current routine/usual care in the Australia setting. However, future research using a prospective matched comparator that comprehensively assesses all the respective costs is required to verify the current study findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"20 4","pages":"155-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The MindSpot Clinic (MindSpot) offers internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) courses for people with anxiety and depressive disorders in Australia. The efficacy credentials of the courses offered at MindSpot are now well established but not the credentials of cost-effectiveness. The current study is aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Wellbeing Course offered in MindSpot in comparison with the routine/usual care (defined as care in the absence of MindSpot) for people with symptoms of depression or/and anxiety from the perspective of Australian Department of Health.

Methods: An economic model using a one-year decision-tree framework was constructed. The four health states in the model included: fully recovered; partially recovered; no improvement; and deteriorated. The probabilities between the four health states in the model were derived from a series of individual client datasets and from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. The EuroQol Five Dimension -- Five Level was used to derive the utilities, and costs were expressed in 2014 Australian dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of results to key model parameters.

Results: In the base case analysis, for people seeking treatment, care offered at Mindspot cost less and achieved greater benefits compared to the comparator. By adopting MindSpot, an additional 505 of fully recovered and 223 of partially recovered clients can be achieved per annum compared to routine/usual care. The result of the sensitivity analyses indicated the result of the analysis were robust.

Conclusions: This study found that the iCBT treatments provided by MindSpot were highly cost-effective in comparison with current routine/usual care in the Australia setting. However, future research using a prospective matched comparator that comprehensively assesses all the respective costs is required to verify the current study findings.

澳大利亚在线MindSpot诊所治疗抑郁和焦虑的成本效益
背景:MindSpot诊所(MindSpot)为澳大利亚的焦虑和抑郁障碍患者提供互联网提供的认知行为治疗(iCBT)课程。MindSpot提供的课程的有效性证书现在已经得到了很好的验证,但成本效益的证书还没有得到验证。从澳大利亚卫生部的角度来看,目前的研究旨在评估在MindSpot提供的健康课程与常规/常规护理(定义为没有MindSpot的护理)相比的成本效益,以帮助患有抑郁症或/和焦虑症的人。方法:采用一年决策树框架构建经济模型。模型中的四种健康状态包括:完全康复;部分恢复;没有改善;和恶化。模型中四种健康状态之间的概率来自一系列个人客户数据集和澳大利亚国家心理健康与福祉调查。EuroQol五维度—五层次被用来计算公用事业,成本以2014年澳元表示。进行敏感性分析以检验结果对关键模型参数的稳健性。结果:在基本案例分析中,对于寻求治疗的人来说,与比较者相比,在Mindspot提供的护理成本更低,并且获得了更大的收益。通过采用MindSpot,与常规护理相比,每年可增加505名完全康复的客户和223名部分康复的客户。敏感性分析结果表明,分析结果是稳健的。结论:本研究发现,与澳大利亚目前的常规/常规护理相比,MindSpot提供的iCBT治疗具有很高的成本效益。然而,未来的研究需要使用前瞻性匹配比较器来全面评估所有各自的成本,以验证当前的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信