Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison.

Language and literature (Harlow, England) Pub Date : 2017-05-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-21 DOI:10.1177/0963947017704731
Patricia Canning
{"title":"Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison.","authors":"Patricia Canning","doi":"10.1177/0963947017704731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive stylistics offers a range of frameworks for understanding (amongst other things) what producers of literary texts 'do' with language and how they 'do' it. Less prevalent, however, is an understanding of the ways in which these same frameworks offer insights into what <i>readers</i> 'do' (and how they 'do' it). Text World Theory (Werth, 1999; Gavins, 2007; Whiteley, 2011) has proved useful for understanding how and why readers construct mental representations engendered by the act of reading. However, research on readers' responses to literature has largely focused on an 'idealised' reader or an 'experimental' subject-reader often derived from within the academy and conducted using contrived or amended literary fiction. Moreover, the format of traditional book groups (participants read texts privately and discuss them at a later date) as well as online community forums such as Goodreads, means that such studies derive data from post-hoc, rather than real-time textual encounters and discussions. The current study is the first of its kind in analysing real-time reading contexts with real readers during a researcher-led literary project ('read.live.learn') in Northern Ireland's only female prison. In doing so, the study is unique in addressing experimental and post hoc bias. Using Text World Theory, the paper considers the personal and social <i>impact</i> of reader engagement in the talk of the participants. As such, it has three interrelated aims: to argue for the social and personal benefits of reading stylistically rich literature in real-time reading groups; to demonstrate the efficacy of stylistics for understanding how those benefits come about, and to demonstrate the inter-disciplinary value of stylistics, particularly its potential for traversing traditional research parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":92261,"journal":{"name":"Language and literature (Harlow, England)","volume":"26 2","pages":"172-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0963947017704731","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and literature (Harlow, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Cognitive stylistics offers a range of frameworks for understanding (amongst other things) what producers of literary texts 'do' with language and how they 'do' it. Less prevalent, however, is an understanding of the ways in which these same frameworks offer insights into what readers 'do' (and how they 'do' it). Text World Theory (Werth, 1999; Gavins, 2007; Whiteley, 2011) has proved useful for understanding how and why readers construct mental representations engendered by the act of reading. However, research on readers' responses to literature has largely focused on an 'idealised' reader or an 'experimental' subject-reader often derived from within the academy and conducted using contrived or amended literary fiction. Moreover, the format of traditional book groups (participants read texts privately and discuss them at a later date) as well as online community forums such as Goodreads, means that such studies derive data from post-hoc, rather than real-time textual encounters and discussions. The current study is the first of its kind in analysing real-time reading contexts with real readers during a researcher-led literary project ('read.live.learn') in Northern Ireland's only female prison. In doing so, the study is unique in addressing experimental and post hoc bias. Using Text World Theory, the paper considers the personal and social impact of reader engagement in the talk of the participants. As such, it has three interrelated aims: to argue for the social and personal benefits of reading stylistically rich literature in real-time reading groups; to demonstrate the efficacy of stylistics for understanding how those benefits come about, and to demonstrate the inter-disciplinary value of stylistics, particularly its potential for traversing traditional research parameters.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

文本世界理论与现实世界读者:从文学到贝尔法斯特监狱生活。
认知文体学提供了一系列框架,用于理解文学文本的生产者用语言“做”了什么以及他们是如何“做”的。然而,不那么流行的是对这些相同框架提供读者“做什么”(以及他们如何“做”)见解的方式的理解。文本世界理论(Werth, 1999;加文,2007;Whiteley, 2011)对于理解读者如何以及为什么构建由阅读行为产生的心理表征是有用的。然而,关于读者对文学的反应的研究主要集中在“理想”读者或“实验”主题读者上,这些读者通常来自学院内部,并使用人为或修改的文学小说进行。此外,传统读书小组(参与者私下阅读文本并在以后讨论)以及在线社区论坛(如Goodreads)的形式意味着这类研究从事后获取数据,而不是实时文本相遇和讨论。目前的研究是在北爱尔兰唯一的女子监狱进行的一项由研究人员主导的文学项目(“阅读。生活。学习”)中,首次对真实读者进行实时阅读语境分析。在这样做时,该研究在解决实验和事后偏见方面是独一无二的。运用文本世界理论,本文考虑了读者参与对参与者谈话的个人和社会影响。因此,它有三个相互关联的目标:论证在实时阅读群体中阅读风格丰富的文学作品对社会和个人的好处;展示文体学在理解这些好处是如何产生的功效,并展示文体学的跨学科价值,特别是其跨越传统研究参数的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信