Race and Alopecia Areata amongst US Women

Q2 Medicine
Jordan M. Thompson , Min Kyung Park , Abrar A. Qureshi , Eunyoung Cho
{"title":"Race and Alopecia Areata amongst US Women","authors":"Jordan M. Thompson ,&nbsp;Min Kyung Park ,&nbsp;Abrar A. Qureshi ,&nbsp;Eunyoung Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.jisp.2017.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies have examined the clinical epidemiology of alopecia areata (AA) in regard to patient race, and therefore, any disparities in incidence or prevalence of disease are largely unexplored. We sought to investigate potential racial disparities amongst two large cohorts of women. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII), wherein participants self-reported a diagnosis of AA. We determined odds ratios for AA by race in a multivariate analysis. Among 63,960 women from NHS and 88,368 women from NHSII with information on race and diagnosis of AA, we identified 418 and 738 cases of AA, respectively. In NHS, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio for AA was 2.72 (95% confidence interval 1.61–4.61) amongst black women as compared with white women. In NHSII, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio was 5.48 (95% confidence interval 4.10–7.32) amongst black as compared with white women. In a secondary analysis designating participants by Hispanic ethnicity, in NHSII the multivariate odds ratio was 1.94 (95% CI 1.24–3.02) in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic white women. In this study, we found increased odds of AA based on self-reported race in black and Hispanic women as compared with white women. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanism of this racial disparity related to AA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages S47-S50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jisp.2017.10.007","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087002417300400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Few studies have examined the clinical epidemiology of alopecia areata (AA) in regard to patient race, and therefore, any disparities in incidence or prevalence of disease are largely unexplored. We sought to investigate potential racial disparities amongst two large cohorts of women. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII), wherein participants self-reported a diagnosis of AA. We determined odds ratios for AA by race in a multivariate analysis. Among 63,960 women from NHS and 88,368 women from NHSII with information on race and diagnosis of AA, we identified 418 and 738 cases of AA, respectively. In NHS, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio for AA was 2.72 (95% confidence interval 1.61–4.61) amongst black women as compared with white women. In NHSII, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio was 5.48 (95% confidence interval 4.10–7.32) amongst black as compared with white women. In a secondary analysis designating participants by Hispanic ethnicity, in NHSII the multivariate odds ratio was 1.94 (95% CI 1.24–3.02) in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic white women. In this study, we found increased odds of AA based on self-reported race in black and Hispanic women as compared with white women. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanism of this racial disparity related to AA.

美国女性的种族和斑秃
很少有研究检查斑秃(AA)的临床流行病学与患者种族的关系,因此,发病率或患病率的差异在很大程度上是未知的。我们试图调查两大女性群体中潜在的种族差异。我们从护士健康研究(NHS)和护士健康研究II (NHSII)中进行了横断面分析,其中参与者自我报告了AA的诊断。我们在多变量分析中确定了种族AA的优势比。在来自NHS的63960名女性和来自NHSII的88368名女性中,我们分别确定了418例和738例AA病例。在NHS中,黑人女性与白人女性相比,AA的多变量调整优势比为2.72(95%可信区间1.61-4.61)。在NHSII中,黑人女性与白人女性的多变量校正优势比为5.48(95%可信区间4.10-7.32)。在一项根据西班牙裔指定参与者的二次分析中,在NHSII中,西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人女性的多变量优势比为1.94 (95% CI 1.24-3.02)。在这项研究中,我们发现与白人女性相比,黑人和西班牙裔女性基于自我报告的种族而发生AA的几率更高。这种种族差异与AA的关系机制有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings (JIDSP) publishes peer-reviewed, invited papers relevant to all aspects of cutaneous biology and skin disease. Papers in the JIDSP are often initially presented at a scientific meeting. Potential topics include biochemistry, biophysics, carcinogenesis, cellular growth and regulation, clinical research, development, epidemiology and other population-based research, extracellular matrix, genetics, immunology, melanocyte biology, microbiology, molecular and cell biology, pathology, pharmacology and percutaneous absorption, photobiology, physiology, and skin structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信