A method for evaluating discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms.

Q1 Mathematics
Computational Social Networks Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-11 DOI:10.1186/s40649-017-0045-3
Daniel Lamprecht, Markus Strohmaier, Denis Helic
{"title":"A method for evaluating discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms.","authors":"Daniel Lamprecht,&nbsp;Markus Strohmaier,&nbsp;Denis Helic","doi":"10.1186/s40649-017-0045-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recommendations are increasingly used to support and enable discovery, browsing, and exploration of items. This is especially true for entertainment platforms such as Netflix or YouTube, where frequently, no clear categorization of items exists. Yet, the suitability of a recommendation algorithm to support these use cases cannot be comprehensively evaluated by any recommendation evaluation measures proposed so far. In this paper, we propose a method to expand the repertoire of existing recommendation evaluation techniques with a method to evaluate the discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms. The proposed method tackles this by means of first evaluating the discoverability of recommendation algorithms by investigating structural properties of the resulting recommender systems in terms of bow tie structure, and path lengths. Second, the method evaluates navigability by simulating three different models of information seeking scenarios and measuring the success rates. We show the feasibility of our method by applying it to four non-personalized recommendation algorithms on three data sets and also illustrate its applicability to personalized algorithms. Our work expands the arsenal of evaluation techniques for recommendation algorithms, extends from a one-click-based evaluation towards multi-click analysis, and presents a general, comprehensive method to evaluating navigability of arbitrary recommendation algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52145,"journal":{"name":"Computational Social Networks","volume":"4 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40649-017-0045-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-017-0045-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Recommendations are increasingly used to support and enable discovery, browsing, and exploration of items. This is especially true for entertainment platforms such as Netflix or YouTube, where frequently, no clear categorization of items exists. Yet, the suitability of a recommendation algorithm to support these use cases cannot be comprehensively evaluated by any recommendation evaluation measures proposed so far. In this paper, we propose a method to expand the repertoire of existing recommendation evaluation techniques with a method to evaluate the discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms. The proposed method tackles this by means of first evaluating the discoverability of recommendation algorithms by investigating structural properties of the resulting recommender systems in terms of bow tie structure, and path lengths. Second, the method evaluates navigability by simulating three different models of information seeking scenarios and measuring the success rates. We show the feasibility of our method by applying it to four non-personalized recommendation algorithms on three data sets and also illustrate its applicability to personalized algorithms. Our work expands the arsenal of evaluation techniques for recommendation algorithms, extends from a one-click-based evaluation towards multi-click analysis, and presents a general, comprehensive method to evaluating navigability of arbitrary recommendation algorithms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种评价推荐算法可发现性和可导航性的方法。
推荐越来越多地用于支持和支持发现、浏览和探索项目。对于像Netflix或YouTube这样的娱乐平台来说尤其如此,在这些平台上,通常没有明确的项目分类。然而,目前提出的任何推荐评价方法都无法全面评价推荐算法支持这些用例的适用性。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,通过评估推荐算法的可发现性和可导航性来扩展现有推荐评估技术的知识库。所提出的方法通过首先评估推荐算法的可发现性来解决这个问题,方法是根据领结结构和路径长度来研究所得到的推荐系统的结构属性。其次,该方法通过模拟三种不同的信息搜索场景模型并测量成功率来评估导航性。我们将该方法应用于三组数据集上的四种非个性化推荐算法,证明了该方法的可行性,并说明了其对个性化算法的适用性。我们的工作扩展了推荐算法的评估技术库,从基于一次点击的评估扩展到多次点击分析,并提出了一种通用的、综合的方法来评估任意推荐算法的可导航性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Social Networks
Computational Social Networks Mathematics-Modeling and Simulation
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational Social Networks showcases refereed papers dealing with all mathematical, computational and applied aspects of social computing. The objective of this journal is to advance and promote the theoretical foundation, mathematical aspects, and applications of social computing. Submissions are welcome which focus on common principles, algorithms and tools that govern network structures/topologies, network functionalities, security and privacy, network behaviors, information diffusions and influence, social recommendation systems which are applicable to all types of social networks and social media. Topics include (but are not limited to) the following: -Social network design and architecture -Mathematical modeling and analysis -Real-world complex networks -Information retrieval in social contexts, political analysts -Network structure analysis -Network dynamics optimization -Complex network robustness and vulnerability -Information diffusion models and analysis -Security and privacy -Searching in complex networks -Efficient algorithms -Network behaviors -Trust and reputation -Social Influence -Social Recommendation -Social media analysis -Big data analysis on online social networks This journal publishes rigorously refereed papers dealing with all mathematical, computational and applied aspects of social computing. The journal also includes reviews of appropriate books as special issues on hot topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信