Michael A Schwartz, Marcin Moskalewicz, Osborne P Wiggins
{"title":"Karl Jaspers: The Icon of Modern Psychiatry.","authors":"Michael A Schwartz, Marcin Moskalewicz, Osborne P Wiggins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>December 2015 and March 2016 issues of the American Journal of Psychiatry contain a debate focusing on the legacy of Emil Kraepelin, widely considered one of the founders if not the iconic founder of modern scientific psychiatry. The authors, Eric J. Engstrom and Kenneth S. Kendler, challenge the so-called neo-Kraepelinian view of Kraepelin and argue that the true, historical Kraepelin was far more inclined towards scientific psychology, less reductionist and brain-centric, and more skeptical nosologically than his later followers apparently believe. Commenting upon this paper, Rael D. Strous, Annette A. Opler, and Lewis A. Opler do not question these claims per se, but rather recall and emphasize historical facts that the paper regrettably omitted: Kraepelin's avid promotion of degeneration theory, eugenics, racism, and anti-Semitism as well as his mentoring of several of the most prominent Nazi-collaborating psychiatrists. Strous, Opler and Opler go on to suggest that it is now time for psychiatry to unburden itself of any iconic indebtedness to Kraepelin. The authors of the current paper agree, and propose to replace Kraepelin with the psychiatrist Karl Jaspers, MD (1883-1969) as the proper iconic founder of present-day and future psychiatry. Acknowledging our debt to Jaspers can usher in a fully humanistic and scientific psychiatric practice that can flourish as a medical discipline that is respectful of and of service to patients, beneficial for research, multiperspectival and methodologically pluralistic.</p>","PeriodicalId":92228,"journal":{"name":"Israel journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
December 2015 and March 2016 issues of the American Journal of Psychiatry contain a debate focusing on the legacy of Emil Kraepelin, widely considered one of the founders if not the iconic founder of modern scientific psychiatry. The authors, Eric J. Engstrom and Kenneth S. Kendler, challenge the so-called neo-Kraepelinian view of Kraepelin and argue that the true, historical Kraepelin was far more inclined towards scientific psychology, less reductionist and brain-centric, and more skeptical nosologically than his later followers apparently believe. Commenting upon this paper, Rael D. Strous, Annette A. Opler, and Lewis A. Opler do not question these claims per se, but rather recall and emphasize historical facts that the paper regrettably omitted: Kraepelin's avid promotion of degeneration theory, eugenics, racism, and anti-Semitism as well as his mentoring of several of the most prominent Nazi-collaborating psychiatrists. Strous, Opler and Opler go on to suggest that it is now time for psychiatry to unburden itself of any iconic indebtedness to Kraepelin. The authors of the current paper agree, and propose to replace Kraepelin with the psychiatrist Karl Jaspers, MD (1883-1969) as the proper iconic founder of present-day and future psychiatry. Acknowledging our debt to Jaspers can usher in a fully humanistic and scientific psychiatric practice that can flourish as a medical discipline that is respectful of and of service to patients, beneficial for research, multiperspectival and methodologically pluralistic.
2015年12月和2016年3月的《美国精神病学杂志》(American Journal of Psychiatry)刊登了一篇关于埃米尔·克雷佩林(Emil Kraepelin)遗产的辩论,他被广泛认为是现代科学精神病学的奠基人之一,如果不是标志性的奠基人的话。作者Eric J. Engstrom和Kenneth S. Kendler对Kraepelin的所谓新Kraepelin观点提出了挑战,并认为真实的、历史上的Kraepelin远比他后来的追随者所认为的更倾向于科学心理学,更少的还原论和以大脑为中心,在病理性上更持怀疑态度。在评论这篇论文时,雷尔·d·史瑞斯、安妮特·a·奥普勒和刘易斯·a·奥普勒并没有质疑这些说法本身,而是回忆并强调了这篇论文遗憾地遗漏的历史事实:克莱佩林对退化理论、优生学、种族主义和反犹太主义的狂热推广,以及他对几位最杰出的纳粹合作精神科医生的指导。莫瑞斯、奥普勒和奥普勒接着建议,现在是精神病学卸下对克雷佩林的标志性亏欠的时候了。当前这篇论文的作者同意这一观点,并建议用精神病学家卡尔·贾斯珀斯博士(1883-1969)取代Kraepelin,成为当今和未来精神病学的真正标志性创始人。承认我们对雅斯贝尔斯的亏欠可以引领一个完全人性化和科学的精神病学实践,它可以作为一门医学学科蓬勃发展,尊重和服务患者,有利于研究,多视角和方法论多元化。