{"title":"Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated\nto non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov\nmodel, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated.\nResults determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and\nreduce treatment-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23510,"journal":{"name":"Urologic nursing","volume":"36 5","pages":"233-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This health economic evaluation simulated a cohort to compare hydrophilic-coated
to non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. By using a Markov
model, lifetime costs and catheter-related complications were investigated.
Results determined that the use of hydrophilic-coated catheters save money and
reduce treatment-related complications.