Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Q1 Medicine
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Pub Date : 2017-12-11 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13013-017-0144-9
James Cheshire, Adrian Gardner, Fiona Berryman, Paul Pynsent
{"title":"Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?","authors":"James Cheshire,&nbsp;Adrian Gardner,&nbsp;Fiona Berryman,&nbsp;Paul Pynsent","doi":"10.1186/s13013-017-0144-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognised in the management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Integrated Shape Imaging System 2 (ISIS2) surface topography is a validated tool to assess AIS. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate strong correlations between AIS and patient-reported outcomes highlighting the need for additional objective surface parameters to define the deformities associated with AIS. The aim of this study was to examine whether the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) outcome questionnaire reflects the degree of measurable external asymmetry of the back in AIS and thus is a measure of patient outcome for external appearance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 102 pre-operative AIS patients were identified retrospectively. Objective parameters were measured using ISIS2 surface topography. The associations between these parameters and the self-image and mental health domains of the SRS-22 questionnaire were investigated using correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 self-image score were of weak strength. Similarly, all correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 mental health score were of weak strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SRS-22 mental health and self-image domains correlate poorly with external measures of deformity. This demonstrates that the assessment of mental health and self-image by the SRS-22 has little to do with external torso shape. Whilst the SRS-22 assesses the patient as a whole, it provides little information about objective measures of deformity over which a surgeon has control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21573,"journal":{"name":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13013-017-0144-9","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0144-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognised in the management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Integrated Shape Imaging System 2 (ISIS2) surface topography is a validated tool to assess AIS. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate strong correlations between AIS and patient-reported outcomes highlighting the need for additional objective surface parameters to define the deformities associated with AIS. The aim of this study was to examine whether the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) outcome questionnaire reflects the degree of measurable external asymmetry of the back in AIS and thus is a measure of patient outcome for external appearance.

Methods: A total of 102 pre-operative AIS patients were identified retrospectively. Objective parameters were measured using ISIS2 surface topography. The associations between these parameters and the self-image and mental health domains of the SRS-22 questionnaire were investigated using correlation coefficients.

Results: All correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 self-image score were of weak strength. Similarly, all correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 mental health score were of weak strength.

Conclusion: The SRS-22 mental health and self-image domains correlate poorly with external measures of deformity. This demonstrates that the assessment of mental health and self-image by the SRS-22 has little to do with external torso shape. Whilst the SRS-22 assesses the patient as a whole, it provides little information about objective measures of deformity over which a surgeon has control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

SRS-22自我形象和心理健康领域评分是否反映青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的背部不对称程度?
背景:在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的管理中,患者报告的结果越来越得到认可。综合形状成像系统2 (ISIS2)表面形貌是评估AIS的有效工具。先前的研究未能证明AIS与患者报告的结果之间存在很强的相关性,这突出了需要额外的客观表面参数来定义AIS相关的畸形。本研究的目的是检查脊柱侧凸研究协会-22 (SRS-22)结果问卷是否反映了AIS患者可测量的背部外部不对称程度,从而衡量患者的外观结果。方法:对102例AIS术前患者进行回顾性分析。利用ISIS2表面形貌测量客观参数。采用相关系数法研究这些参数与自我形象和心理健康领域的关系。结果:不对称参数与SRS-22自我形象评分之间均呈弱相关。同样,不对称参数与SRS-22心理健康评分之间的相关性均为弱。结论:SRS-22心理健康和自我形象域与畸形的外部测量相关性较差。结果表明,SRS-22量表对心理健康和自我形象的评价与外部躯干形状关系不大。虽然SRS-22对患者进行整体评估,但它提供的关于外科医生可以控制的畸形的客观测量信息很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation.Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders is an open access, multidisciplinary journal that encompasses all aspects of research on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and cost-analyses of conservative and surgical management of all spinal deformities and disorders. Both clinical and basic science reports form the cornerstone of the journal in its endeavour to provide original, primary studies as well as narrative/systematic reviews and meta-analyses to the academic community and beyond. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders aims to provide an integrated and balanced view of cutting-edge spine research to further enhance effective collaboration among clinical spine specialists and scientists, and to ultimately improve patient outcomes based on an evidence-based spine care approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书