Mayo registry for telemetry efficacy in arrest study: An evaluation of the feasibility of the do not intubate code status.

Acute cardiac care Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-06 DOI:10.1080/17482941.2017.1408917
David Snipelisky, Adrian Dumitrascu, Jordan Ray, Archana Roy, Gautam Matcha, Dana Harris, Tyler Vadeboncoeur, Fred Kusumoto, M Caroline Burton
{"title":"Mayo registry for telemetry efficacy in arrest study: An evaluation of the feasibility of the do not intubate code status.","authors":"David Snipelisky,&nbsp;Adrian Dumitrascu,&nbsp;Jordan Ray,&nbsp;Archana Roy,&nbsp;Gautam Matcha,&nbsp;Dana Harris,&nbsp;Tyler Vadeboncoeur,&nbsp;Fred Kusumoto,&nbsp;M Caroline Burton","doi":"10.1080/17482941.2017.1408917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Guidelines recommend discussing code status with patients on hospital admission. No study has evaluated the feasibility of a full code with do not intubate (DNI) status. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients who experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest was performed between May 1, 2008 and June 20, 2014. A descriptive analysis was created based on whether patients required mechanical ventilatory support during the hospitalization and comparisons were made between both patient subsets. <b>Results:</b> A total of 239 patients were included. Almost all (n = 218, 91.2%) required intubation during the hospitalization. Over half (n = 117, 53.7%) were intubated on the same day as the cardiopulmonary arrest and 91 patients (41.7%) were intubated at the time of arrest. Comparisons between intubated and non-intubated patients showed little differences in clinical characteristics, except for a higher proportion of medical cardiac etiology for admission in patients who did not require intubation (n = 10, 47.6% versus n = 55, 25.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.18) and initial arrest rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (n = 8, 38.1% versus n = 50, 22.9%; <i>p </i>= 0.37). No differences in 24-hour and posthospital survivals were present. <b>Conclusion:</b> Mechanical ventilatory support is commonly utilized in patients who experience a cardiopulmonary arrest. The DNI status may not be a feasible code status option for most patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"18 4","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482941.2017.1408917","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482941.2017.1408917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Guidelines recommend discussing code status with patients on hospital admission. No study has evaluated the feasibility of a full code with do not intubate (DNI) status. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest was performed between May 1, 2008 and June 20, 2014. A descriptive analysis was created based on whether patients required mechanical ventilatory support during the hospitalization and comparisons were made between both patient subsets. Results: A total of 239 patients were included. Almost all (n = 218, 91.2%) required intubation during the hospitalization. Over half (n = 117, 53.7%) were intubated on the same day as the cardiopulmonary arrest and 91 patients (41.7%) were intubated at the time of arrest. Comparisons between intubated and non-intubated patients showed little differences in clinical characteristics, except for a higher proportion of medical cardiac etiology for admission in patients who did not require intubation (n = 10, 47.6% versus n = 55, 25.2%; p = 0.18) and initial arrest rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (n = 8, 38.1% versus n = 50, 22.9%; = 0.37). No differences in 24-hour and posthospital survivals were present. Conclusion: Mechanical ventilatory support is commonly utilized in patients who experience a cardiopulmonary arrest. The DNI status may not be a feasible code status option for most patients.

梅奥注册中心在心脏骤停研究中的遥测疗效:评估不插管码状态的可行性。
导言:指南建议在入院时与患者讨论代码状态。没有研究评估了不插管(DNI)状态下完整代码的可行性。方法:回顾性分析2008年5月1日至2014年6月20日期间发生心肺骤停的患者。基于患者在住院期间是否需要机械通气支持进行描述性分析,并对两组患者进行比较。结果:共纳入239例患者。几乎所有患者(n = 218, 91.2%)在住院期间都需要插管。超过半数(117例,53.7%)患者在心肺骤停当天插管,91例(41.7%)患者在心肺骤停时插管。插管和非插管患者的临床特征比较差异不大,除了不需要插管的患者入院时医学心脏病因的比例更高(n = 10, 47.6% vs n = 55, 25.2%;P = 0.18)和室性心动过速/颤动的初始骤停节律(n = 8, 38.1% vs n = 50, 22.9%;p = 0.37)。24小时生存率和出院后生存率无差异。结论:机械通气支持常用于心肺骤停患者。对于大多数患者来说,DNI状态可能不是一个可行的代码状态选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信