Nonworksite Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior among Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Keith M Thraen-Borowski, Laura D Ellingson, Jacob D Meyer, Lisa Cadmus-Bertram
{"title":"Nonworksite Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior among Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Keith M Thraen-Borowski,&nbsp;Laura D Ellingson,&nbsp;Jacob D Meyer,&nbsp;Lisa Cadmus-Bertram","doi":"10.1249/TJX.0000000000000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sedentary behavior has been identified as a major health risk. While interventions to reduce time spent sedentary have become increasingly prevalent, the vast majority of this work in adults has been focused on workplace sedentary behavior, and often pairs sedentary reduction interventions with increasing physical activity. As research designed to specifically decrease sedentary time that is not limited to the workplace becomes available, identifying strategies and approaches, along with feasibility and efficacy of these interventions, is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for sedentary interventions with eligibility criteria including: (a) interventions designed to explicitly reduce sedentary behavior that were not limited to the workplace, (b) outcomes specific to sedentary behavior, (c) adults aged at least 18 years, and (d) written in English.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 767 full-text manuscripts were identified, with thirteen studies meeting all eligibility criteria. While intervention characteristics and methodological quality varied greatly among studies, ten of the thirteen studies observed a significant reduction in objectively measured sitting time post-intervention. In those studies that collected participant feasibility/acceptability data, all reported that the intervention was viewed as \"favorable to very favorable,\" would use again, and that participant burden was quite low, suggesting that these interventions were feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedentary behavior interventions not limited to the workplace appear to be largely efficacious. While results varied with respect to the magnitude of the decrease in time spent sedentary, they are encouraging. However, due to the small body of evidence and the variability of study designs, our ability to make overarching statements regarding \"best practices\" at this time is limited. Well-controlled trials of longer duration with larger samples, using theoretically-based interventions with consistent prescriptions for limiting sedentary time are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"2 12","pages":"68-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630153/pdf/nihms865597.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose: Sedentary behavior has been identified as a major health risk. While interventions to reduce time spent sedentary have become increasingly prevalent, the vast majority of this work in adults has been focused on workplace sedentary behavior, and often pairs sedentary reduction interventions with increasing physical activity. As research designed to specifically decrease sedentary time that is not limited to the workplace becomes available, identifying strategies and approaches, along with feasibility and efficacy of these interventions, is warranted.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for sedentary interventions with eligibility criteria including: (a) interventions designed to explicitly reduce sedentary behavior that were not limited to the workplace, (b) outcomes specific to sedentary behavior, (c) adults aged at least 18 years, and (d) written in English.

Results: A total of 767 full-text manuscripts were identified, with thirteen studies meeting all eligibility criteria. While intervention characteristics and methodological quality varied greatly among studies, ten of the thirteen studies observed a significant reduction in objectively measured sitting time post-intervention. In those studies that collected participant feasibility/acceptability data, all reported that the intervention was viewed as "favorable to very favorable," would use again, and that participant burden was quite low, suggesting that these interventions were feasible.

Conclusion: Sedentary behavior interventions not limited to the workplace appear to be largely efficacious. While results varied with respect to the magnitude of the decrease in time spent sedentary, they are encouraging. However, due to the small body of evidence and the variability of study designs, our ability to make overarching statements regarding "best practices" at this time is limited. Well-controlled trials of longer duration with larger samples, using theoretically-based interventions with consistent prescriptions for limiting sedentary time are needed.

Abstract Image

非工作场所干预减少成年人久坐行为:一项系统综述。
目的:久坐行为已被确定为主要的健康风险。虽然减少久坐时间的干预措施变得越来越普遍,但绝大多数针对成年人的研究都集中在工作场所的久坐行为上,并且通常将减少久坐的干预措施与增加身体活动相结合。随着旨在减少不限于工作场所的久坐时间的研究变得可行,确定策略和方法,以及这些干预措施的可行性和有效性,是有必要的。方法:在电子数据库中搜索久坐干预措施的资格标准,包括:(a)旨在明确减少不限于工作场所的久坐行为的干预措施,(b)针对久坐行为的具体结果,(c)年龄在18岁以上的成年人,(d)以英语撰写。结果:共纳入767篇全文稿件,其中13篇研究符合所有入选标准。虽然不同研究的干预特征和方法质量差异很大,但13项研究中有10项观察到干预后客观测量的坐着时间显着减少。在那些收集了参与者可行性/可接受性数据的研究中,所有的研究都报告说,干预措施被认为是“有利到非常有利的”,会再次使用,参与者的负担相当低,表明这些干预措施是可行的。结论:不局限于工作场所的久坐行为干预似乎很大程度上是有效的。虽然结果在久坐时间减少的幅度上有所不同,但它们都是令人鼓舞的。然而,由于证据较少和研究设计的可变性,我们目前对“最佳实践”做出总体陈述的能力有限。我们需要进行控制良好、持续时间更长、样本量更大的试验,使用基于理论的干预措施和一致的处方来限制久坐时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信