Asymmetric and Symmetric Unbiased Image Registration: Statistical Assessment of Performance.

Igor Yanovsky, Paul M Thompson, Stanley Osher, Alex D Leow
{"title":"Asymmetric and Symmetric Unbiased Image Registration: Statistical Assessment of Performance.","authors":"Igor Yanovsky,&nbsp;Paul M Thompson,&nbsp;Stanley Osher,&nbsp;Alex D Leow","doi":"10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measures of brain changes can be computed from sequential MRI scans, providing valuable information on disease progression for neuroscientific studies and clinical trials. Tensor-based morphometry (TBM) creates maps of these brain changes, visualizing the 3D profile and rates of tissue growth or atrophy. In this paper, we examine the power of different nonrigid registration models to detect changes in TBM, and their stability when no real changes are present. Specifically, we investigate an asymmetric version of a recently proposed unbiased registration method, using mutual information as the matching criterion. We compare matching functionals (sum of squared differences and mutual information), as well as large deformation registration schemes (viscous fluid registration versus symmetric and asymmetric unbiased registration) for detecting changes in serial MRI scans of 10 elderly normal subjects and 10 patients with Alzheimer's Disease scanned at 2-week and 1-year intervals. We demonstrated that the unbiased methods, both symmetric and asymmetric, have higher reproducibility. The unbiased methods were also less likely to detect changes in the absence of any real physiological change. Moreover, they measured biological deformations more accurately by penalizing bias in the corresponding statistical maps.</p>","PeriodicalId":89346,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops","volume":"2008 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562988","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Measures of brain changes can be computed from sequential MRI scans, providing valuable information on disease progression for neuroscientific studies and clinical trials. Tensor-based morphometry (TBM) creates maps of these brain changes, visualizing the 3D profile and rates of tissue growth or atrophy. In this paper, we examine the power of different nonrigid registration models to detect changes in TBM, and their stability when no real changes are present. Specifically, we investigate an asymmetric version of a recently proposed unbiased registration method, using mutual information as the matching criterion. We compare matching functionals (sum of squared differences and mutual information), as well as large deformation registration schemes (viscous fluid registration versus symmetric and asymmetric unbiased registration) for detecting changes in serial MRI scans of 10 elderly normal subjects and 10 patients with Alzheimer's Disease scanned at 2-week and 1-year intervals. We demonstrated that the unbiased methods, both symmetric and asymmetric, have higher reproducibility. The unbiased methods were also less likely to detect changes in the absence of any real physiological change. Moreover, they measured biological deformations more accurately by penalizing bias in the corresponding statistical maps.

非对称和对称无偏图像配准:性能的统计评估。
大脑变化的测量可以通过连续的MRI扫描来计算,为神经科学研究和临床试验提供有价值的疾病进展信息。基于张量的形态测量(TBM)创建了这些大脑变化的地图,可视化了组织生长或萎缩的3D轮廓和速率。在本文中,我们检验了不同的非刚性配准模型检测TBM变化的能力,以及它们在没有实际变化时的稳定性。具体来说,我们研究了最近提出的无偏配准方法的非对称版本,使用互信息作为匹配标准。我们比较了匹配函数(差异平方和和互信息)以及大变形配准方案(粘性流体配准与对称和非对称无偏配准)用于检测10名老年正常受试者和10名阿尔茨海默病患者的连续MRI扫描中的变化,扫描间隔为2周和1年。我们证明了无偏方法,对称和非对称,具有较高的再现性。在没有任何真实生理变化的情况下,无偏方法也不太可能检测到变化。此外,他们通过惩罚相应统计图中的偏差,更准确地测量了生物变形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信