Perceived and Real Histopathology Turnaround Time: A Teaching Hospital Experience.

Akinfenwa Taoheed Atanda, Ibrahim Yusuf, Muhammad Sanusi Haruna
{"title":"Perceived and Real Histopathology Turnaround Time: A Teaching Hospital Experience.","authors":"Akinfenwa Taoheed Atanda,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yusuf,&nbsp;Muhammad Sanusi Haruna","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_4_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to audit analytic turnaround time (TAT) in a histopathology laboratory with a view to assessing the timeliness of its reports, identify causes of delay in its TAT, and compare this with client perception of its performance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Records of 1440 batches of specimens processed over a 5-year period in the histopathology laboratory of a teaching hospital were retrieved from archives. From these, median and mean TATs were calculated and causes of delay identified. Questionnaires were also deployed to assess physicians' perception of the laboratory's performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analytic TAT was 3.6 ± 2 days, with 86.7% of reports being ready within 5 working days. The delays in timeliness of report generation were due mainly to residency training-related factors; tissue processing-related factors, and inadequate clinical information among others. Client perception of TAT rated the laboratory below average by 18.4%; average by 57.5%; good by 20.7%, and excellent in its performance by 3.4% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though physicians perceived the laboratory's TAT to be just average, its analytic TAT for reports is within acceptable international standards but with room for improvement in its performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"23 2","pages":"98-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/81/NJS-23-98.PMC5649437.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_4_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: This study aims to audit analytic turnaround time (TAT) in a histopathology laboratory with a view to assessing the timeliness of its reports, identify causes of delay in its TAT, and compare this with client perception of its performance.

Materials and methods: Records of 1440 batches of specimens processed over a 5-year period in the histopathology laboratory of a teaching hospital were retrieved from archives. From these, median and mean TATs were calculated and causes of delay identified. Questionnaires were also deployed to assess physicians' perception of the laboratory's performance.

Results: Analytic TAT was 3.6 ± 2 days, with 86.7% of reports being ready within 5 working days. The delays in timeliness of report generation were due mainly to residency training-related factors; tissue processing-related factors, and inadequate clinical information among others. Client perception of TAT rated the laboratory below average by 18.4%; average by 57.5%; good by 20.7%, and excellent in its performance by 3.4% of respondents.

Conclusion: Even though physicians perceived the laboratory's TAT to be just average, its analytic TAT for reports is within acceptable international standards but with room for improvement in its performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

感知和真实的组织病理学周转时间:教学医院的经验。
背景:本研究旨在审核组织病理学实验室的分析周转时间(TAT),以评估其报告的及时性,确定TAT延迟的原因,并将其与客户对其表现的看法进行比较。材料与方法:检索某教学医院组织病理学实验室5年来1440批标本处理记录。从中,计算中位数和平均TATs,并确定延迟的原因。调查问卷也被用来评估医生对实验室表现的看法。结果:分析TAT为3.6±2天,86.7%的报告在5个工作日内完成。报告产生的及时性延迟主要是由于与住院医师培训有关的因素;组织加工相关因素,以及临床信息不足等。客户对TAT评价实验室低于平均水平的比例为18.4%;平均57.5%;20.7%的人认为“好”,3.4%的人认为“优秀”。结论:尽管医生认为实验室的TAT仅为平均水平,但其报告分析TAT在可接受的国际标准范围内,但其性能仍有改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信