To Compare the Effectiveness of Short-term Three Dose Perioperative Antibiotic Coverage during Decisive Period with Conventional Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Usage in Clean Elective Surgical Cases: An Indian Perspective.

Sudhir Khichy, Baldev Singh, Manpreet Singh, Sukha Singh
{"title":"To Compare the Effectiveness of Short-term Three Dose Perioperative Antibiotic Coverage during Decisive Period with Conventional Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Usage in Clean Elective Surgical Cases: An Indian Perspective.","authors":"Sudhir Khichy,&nbsp;Baldev Singh,&nbsp;Manpreet Singh,&nbsp;Sukha Singh","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_55_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections are the most common postoperative complications and frequently cause morbidity and mortality. Different antibiotic regimens were evaluated as prophylaxis in wound infection following elective surgical procedures. Prophylactic antibiotics should be given to cover the \"decisive period\" which is a period after incision to mobilization of host defenses thus preventing an infection from developing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim is to study the effectiveness of short-term antibiotic coverage during decisive period in the prevention of postoperative wound sepsis in clean surgical cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The prospective randomized comparative study included 50 patients divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A (short-term ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received three doses of 1 g intravenous ceftriaxone. First dose 12 h, 2<sup>nd</sup> dose 1 h before operation and the 3<sup>rd</sup> dose was given 10 h after the operation. The Group B (conventional postoperative ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received postoperatively 1 g B. D intravenous ceftriaxone for 5 days. We compared the incidence of surgical site infection in two groups.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>November 2014 to September 2016. A predesigned and pretested proforma was used to collect the data. Surgical sites were examined for 30 days. Robertson grading was used to assess the severity of infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical site infection rate was 4% in Group A and 24% in Group B. The severity of infection was less in short-term prophylaxis group. Anemia, nutritional status, and use of drain were other factors associated with postoperative wound infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short course perioperative (three doses) ceftriaxone prophylaxis is sufficient in preventing wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotic should be given to cover the decisive period to prevent an infection from developing. The judicious use of antibiotics can reduce the cost, unnecessary prolonged exposure, side effects, and the emergence of resistant micro-organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"23 2","pages":"92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/b1/NJS-23-92.PMC5649436.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_55_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections are the most common postoperative complications and frequently cause morbidity and mortality. Different antibiotic regimens were evaluated as prophylaxis in wound infection following elective surgical procedures. Prophylactic antibiotics should be given to cover the "decisive period" which is a period after incision to mobilization of host defenses thus preventing an infection from developing.

Objectives: The aim is to study the effectiveness of short-term antibiotic coverage during decisive period in the prevention of postoperative wound sepsis in clean surgical cases.

Materials and methods: The prospective randomized comparative study included 50 patients divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A (short-term ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received three doses of 1 g intravenous ceftriaxone. First dose 12 h, 2nd dose 1 h before operation and the 3rd dose was given 10 h after the operation. The Group B (conventional postoperative ceftriaxone prophylaxis) patients received postoperatively 1 g B. D intravenous ceftriaxone for 5 days. We compared the incidence of surgical site infection in two groups.

Study period: November 2014 to September 2016. A predesigned and pretested proforma was used to collect the data. Surgical sites were examined for 30 days. Robertson grading was used to assess the severity of infection.

Results: Surgical site infection rate was 4% in Group A and 24% in Group B. The severity of infection was less in short-term prophylaxis group. Anemia, nutritional status, and use of drain were other factors associated with postoperative wound infections.

Conclusion: Short course perioperative (three doses) ceftriaxone prophylaxis is sufficient in preventing wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotic should be given to cover the decisive period to prevent an infection from developing. The judicious use of antibiotics can reduce the cost, unnecessary prolonged exposure, side effects, and the emergence of resistant micro-organisms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较清洁择期手术患者围手术期短期三剂量抗生素覆盖与常规术后延长抗生素使用的有效性:印度视角。
背景:手术部位感染是最常见的术后并发症,经常导致发病率和死亡率。不同的抗生素方案评估预防伤口感染后的选择性外科手术。预防性抗生素应覆盖“决定性时期”,即从切口到动员宿主防御从而防止感染发展的时期。目的:探讨关键时期短期抗生素覆盖预防清洁手术病例术后创面败血症的效果。材料与方法:前瞻性随机对照研究50例患者分为两组,每组25例。A组(短期头孢曲松预防)患者接受3次1 g静脉注射头孢曲松。第一剂于术前12 h,第二剂于术前1 h,第三剂于术后10 h给药。B组(术后常规头孢曲松预防)患者术后给予头孢曲松1 g B / D静脉滴注,持续5 D。我们比较两组手术部位感染的发生率。学习时间:2014年11月至2016年9月。使用预先设计和预先测试的形式来收集数据。手术部位检查30天。罗伯逊分级用于评估感染的严重程度。结果:A组手术部位感染率为4%,b组为24%,短期预防组感染严重程度较轻。贫血、营养状况和引流管的使用是术后伤口感染的其他相关因素。结论:围手术期短疗程(3次)头孢曲松预防足以预防创面感染。预防性抗生素应覆盖决定性时期,以防止感染的发展。明智地使用抗生素可以降低成本,减少不必要的长期接触,减少副作用,减少耐药微生物的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信