Diogenes Syndrome.

Q3 Medicine
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-16 DOI:10.1159/000475688
Frédéric Assal
{"title":"Diogenes Syndrome.","authors":"Frédéric Assal","doi":"10.1159/000475688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diogenes syndrome (DS) is not a specific disease but a real neurobehavioral syndrome, characterized by severe domestic squalor, pathological hoarding, lack of insight into the condition, and no need for help. DS can be secondary when associated to psychosis or bipolar disorder, or primary when it occurs as a single entity, usually in the elderly. DS is a clinically complex transnosographic syndrome for which multidimensional approaches need to be considered: medical, psychiatric, neurological, social, scientific, and ethical. Known for more than 40 years mainly by geriatricians, psychiatrists, nurses or social workers and more recently by forensic specialists, the fine grained mechanisms of the syndrome are still incompletely understood. From a neurocognitive standpoint, frontal vulnerability certainly disrupts normal decision-making processes, explaining squalor, pathological hoarding, and lack of insight but we need to better understand the connection between the main symptoms and the neural underpinning of the full syndrome. We should definitely intervene earlier, before patients refuse any help, and when the syndrome is supposedly milder, to improve our clinical knowledge, follow patients prospectively, experiment hypothesis in laboratory settings, and launch randomized controlled trials for treatments. There is hope for future pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to alleviate this socially disastrous condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":35285,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000475688","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000475688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Diogenes syndrome (DS) is not a specific disease but a real neurobehavioral syndrome, characterized by severe domestic squalor, pathological hoarding, lack of insight into the condition, and no need for help. DS can be secondary when associated to psychosis or bipolar disorder, or primary when it occurs as a single entity, usually in the elderly. DS is a clinically complex transnosographic syndrome for which multidimensional approaches need to be considered: medical, psychiatric, neurological, social, scientific, and ethical. Known for more than 40 years mainly by geriatricians, psychiatrists, nurses or social workers and more recently by forensic specialists, the fine grained mechanisms of the syndrome are still incompletely understood. From a neurocognitive standpoint, frontal vulnerability certainly disrupts normal decision-making processes, explaining squalor, pathological hoarding, and lack of insight but we need to better understand the connection between the main symptoms and the neural underpinning of the full syndrome. We should definitely intervene earlier, before patients refuse any help, and when the syndrome is supposedly milder, to improve our clinical knowledge, follow patients prospectively, experiment hypothesis in laboratory settings, and launch randomized controlled trials for treatments. There is hope for future pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to alleviate this socially disastrous condition.

第欧根尼综合症。
第欧根尼综合征(DS)不是一种特定的疾病,而是一种真正的神经行为综合征,其特征是严重的家庭肮脏,病理性囤积,缺乏对病情的了解,不需要帮助。当伴有精神病或双相情感障碍时,退行性椎体滑移可能是继发性的;当退行性椎体滑移作为单一个体发生时,通常发生在老年人身上。退行性椎体滑移是一种临床复杂的跨门诊学综合征,需要考虑多方面的方法:医学、精神病学、神经学、社会、科学和伦理。40多年来,主要由老年病学家、精神病学家、护士或社会工作者以及最近的法医专家所知,但该综合征的详细机制仍未完全了解。从神经认知的角度来看,额叶脆弱确实扰乱了正常的决策过程,解释了肮脏、病理性囤积和缺乏洞察力,但我们需要更好地理解主要症状与整个综合征的神经基础之间的联系。我们应该在患者拒绝任何帮助之前,在症状被认为较轻的时候,更早地进行干预,以提高我们的临床知识,前瞻性地跟踪患者,在实验室环境中实验假设,并开展随机对照试验。有希望未来的药理学和非药理学策略来减轻这种社会灾难性的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience
Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Focusing on topics in the fields of both Neurosciences and Neurology, this series provides current and unique information in basic and clinical advances on the nervous system and its disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信