{"title":"A simple qualitive procedure for the detection of chloroquine in urine for use in clinical analytical toxicology in resource poor settings.","authors":"D Tagwireyi, L L Gadaga, E D Ball, C F B Nhachi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a simple procedure for the qualitative determination of chloroquine in urine with potential for use in developing countries lacking sophisticated analytical equipment and expensive reagents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a laboratory based study making use of which combines a colorimetric test, Dill-Glazko's test, and UV/Visible absorbance spectrometry to confirm the presence of chloroquine. The spectrophotometric method was cross validated with the standard Baselt's method for quantification of chloroquine in biological fluids.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pharmacology laboratory at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Recovery of the methods was assessed by comparing the peak absorbances and the resolution of the peaks at 329nm and 343nm. Sensitivity and specificity was determined by analysing in a blinded manner. The limits of detection of both the Dill-Glazko's test and the confirmatory test was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prevalidation procedures increasing the volume of the ethylacetate and the volume of the lower aqueous layer extracted was found to increase the recovery of the confirmatory test. There was a significant difference between both the peak absorbances and the peak resolution for the two methods (p<0.0001). The confirmatory test had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the Baselt's method had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The limit of detection of the Dill-Glazko's test was 15mg/Land that of the confirmatory test was 5mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The confirmatory test had better recovery and was more sensitivity compared with the Baselt's method. The limit of detection of the combination method (Dill-Glazko's plus confirmatory test) was 15mg/L. The combination test showed appreciable sensitivity to be suitable for application to clinical\ntoxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74979,"journal":{"name":"The Central African journal of medicine","volume":"59 5-8","pages":"32-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Central African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a simple procedure for the qualitative determination of chloroquine in urine with potential for use in developing countries lacking sophisticated analytical equipment and expensive reagents.
Design: This was a laboratory based study making use of which combines a colorimetric test, Dill-Glazko's test, and UV/Visible absorbance spectrometry to confirm the presence of chloroquine. The spectrophotometric method was cross validated with the standard Baselt's method for quantification of chloroquine in biological fluids.
Setting: Pharmacology laboratory at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.
Main outcome measures: Recovery of the methods was assessed by comparing the peak absorbances and the resolution of the peaks at 329nm and 343nm. Sensitivity and specificity was determined by analysing in a blinded manner. The limits of detection of both the Dill-Glazko's test and the confirmatory test was determined.
Results: In the prevalidation procedures increasing the volume of the ethylacetate and the volume of the lower aqueous layer extracted was found to increase the recovery of the confirmatory test. There was a significant difference between both the peak absorbances and the peak resolution for the two methods (p<0.0001). The confirmatory test had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the Baselt's method had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The limit of detection of the Dill-Glazko's test was 15mg/Land that of the confirmatory test was 5mg/L.
Conclusions: The confirmatory test had better recovery and was more sensitivity compared with the Baselt's method. The limit of detection of the combination method (Dill-Glazko's plus confirmatory test) was 15mg/L. The combination test showed appreciable sensitivity to be suitable for application to clinical
toxicology.