A simple qualitive procedure for the detection of chloroquine in urine for use in clinical analytical toxicology in resource poor settings.

D Tagwireyi, L L Gadaga, E D Ball, C F B Nhachi
{"title":"A simple qualitive procedure for the detection of chloroquine in urine for use in clinical analytical toxicology in resource poor settings.","authors":"D Tagwireyi,&nbsp;L L Gadaga,&nbsp;E D Ball,&nbsp;C F B Nhachi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a simple procedure for the qualitative determination of chloroquine in urine with potential for use in developing countries lacking sophisticated analytical equipment and expensive reagents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a laboratory based study making use of which combines a colorimetric test, Dill-Glazko's test, and UV/Visible absorbance spectrometry to confirm the presence of chloroquine. The spectrophotometric method was cross validated with the standard Baselt's method for quantification of chloroquine in biological fluids.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pharmacology laboratory at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Recovery of the methods was assessed by comparing the peak absorbances and the resolution of the peaks at 329nm and 343nm. Sensitivity and specificity was determined by analysing in a blinded manner. The limits of detection of both the Dill-Glazko's test and the confirmatory test was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prevalidation procedures increasing the volume of the ethylacetate and the volume of the lower aqueous layer extracted was found to increase the recovery of the confirmatory test. There was a significant difference between both the peak absorbances and the peak resolution for the two methods (p<0.0001). The confirmatory test had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the Baselt's method had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The limit of detection of the Dill-Glazko's test was 15mg/Land that of the confirmatory test was 5mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The confirmatory test had better recovery and was more sensitivity compared with the Baselt's method. The limit of detection of the combination method (Dill-Glazko's plus confirmatory test) was 15mg/L. The combination test showed appreciable sensitivity to be suitable for application to clinical\ntoxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74979,"journal":{"name":"The Central African journal of medicine","volume":"59 5-8","pages":"32-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Central African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a simple procedure for the qualitative determination of chloroquine in urine with potential for use in developing countries lacking sophisticated analytical equipment and expensive reagents.

Design: This was a laboratory based study making use of which combines a colorimetric test, Dill-Glazko's test, and UV/Visible absorbance spectrometry to confirm the presence of chloroquine. The spectrophotometric method was cross validated with the standard Baselt's method for quantification of chloroquine in biological fluids.

Setting: Pharmacology laboratory at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.

Main outcome measures: Recovery of the methods was assessed by comparing the peak absorbances and the resolution of the peaks at 329nm and 343nm. Sensitivity and specificity was determined by analysing in a blinded manner. The limits of detection of both the Dill-Glazko's test and the confirmatory test was determined.

Results: In the prevalidation procedures increasing the volume of the ethylacetate and the volume of the lower aqueous layer extracted was found to increase the recovery of the confirmatory test. There was a significant difference between both the peak absorbances and the peak resolution for the two methods (p<0.0001). The confirmatory test had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%, whereas the Baselt's method had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The limit of detection of the Dill-Glazko's test was 15mg/Land that of the confirmatory test was 5mg/L.

Conclusions: The confirmatory test had better recovery and was more sensitivity compared with the Baselt's method. The limit of detection of the combination method (Dill-Glazko's plus confirmatory test) was 15mg/L. The combination test showed appreciable sensitivity to be suitable for application to clinical toxicology.

一种在资源贫乏环境中用于临床分析毒理学的尿液中氯喹检测的简单定性程序。
目的:建立并验证一种简便的尿液中氯喹定性测定方法,该方法有可能在缺乏精密分析设备和昂贵试剂的发展中国家使用。设计:这是一项以实验室为基础的研究,利用比色试验、迪尔-格拉兹科试验和紫外/可见吸收光谱法来确认氯喹的存在。将分光光度法与标准Baselt法进行了交叉验证,用于生物体液中氯喹的定量分析。单位:津巴布韦大学卫生科学学院临床药学系药理学实验室。主要观察指标:通过比较329nm和343nm峰的吸光度和分辨率来评价方法的回收率。通过盲法分析确定敏感性和特异性。测定Dill-Glazko试验和确认试验的检出限。结果:在预验证过程中,增加乙酸乙酯的体积和下水层的萃取量可以增加验证试验的回收率。两种方法的峰吸光度和峰分辨率差异均有统计学意义(p)。结论:与Baselt法相比,验证法具有更好的回收率和更高的灵敏度。联合法(迪尔-格拉兹科加验证法)的检出限为15mg/L。该联合试验灵敏度较高,适合应用于临床毒理学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信