Emergency department attendances and GP patient satisfaction.

London journal of primary care Pub Date : 2017-06-05 eCollection Date: 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1080/17571472.2017.1333616
Keith Hurst, Deirdre Kelley-Patterson, Andy Knapton
{"title":"Emergency department attendances and GP patient satisfaction.","authors":"Keith Hurst,&nbsp;Deirdre Kelley-Patterson,&nbsp;Andy Knapton","doi":"10.1080/17571472.2017.1333616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite invaluable national data, reasons for the relentless rise in England's emergency department (ED) attendances remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All EDs and general practices in England.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>Are rising ED attendances related to general practice patient satisfaction, i.e. if patients are unable to get a convenient appointment with their general practitioner (GP), then do they attend their local ED for diagnosis, treatment and care instead?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GP patient satisfaction and ED attendance data were extracted from national data warehouses and organised into two groups: (i) England clinical commissioning group (CCG) areas and (ii) a London CCG subset. Data from London CCGs were compared with CCGs outside London.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ED attendances were strongly correlated with GP patient satisfaction data in non-London CCGs, e.g. if patients said they had difficulty obtaining a convenient appointment at their general practice, then local ED attendances increased. Associations were repeated when other GP perception data were explored, e.g. if patients were satisfied with GPs and practice nurses, then they were less likely to attend their local EDs. However, these associations were not found in the London CCG subset despite lower satisfaction with London GP services.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Although our study generates valuable insights into ED attendances, the reasons why London general practice patient and ED attendance data don't show the same associations found outside London warrants further study. Diverting patients from EDs to primary care services may not be straight forward as many would like to believe.</p>","PeriodicalId":89823,"journal":{"name":"London journal of primary care","volume":"9 5","pages":"69-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17571472.2017.1333616","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London journal of primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1333616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Despite invaluable national data, reasons for the relentless rise in England's emergency department (ED) attendances remain elusive.

Setting: All EDs and general practices in England.

Question: Are rising ED attendances related to general practice patient satisfaction, i.e. if patients are unable to get a convenient appointment with their general practitioner (GP), then do they attend their local ED for diagnosis, treatment and care instead?

Method: GP patient satisfaction and ED attendance data were extracted from national data warehouses and organised into two groups: (i) England clinical commissioning group (CCG) areas and (ii) a London CCG subset. Data from London CCGs were compared with CCGs outside London.

Results: ED attendances were strongly correlated with GP patient satisfaction data in non-London CCGs, e.g. if patients said they had difficulty obtaining a convenient appointment at their general practice, then local ED attendances increased. Associations were repeated when other GP perception data were explored, e.g. if patients were satisfied with GPs and practice nurses, then they were less likely to attend their local EDs. However, these associations were not found in the London CCG subset despite lower satisfaction with London GP services.

Discussion and conclusions: Although our study generates valuable insights into ED attendances, the reasons why London general practice patient and ED attendance data don't show the same associations found outside London warrants further study. Diverting patients from EDs to primary care services may not be straight forward as many would like to believe.

急诊科出勤率和全科医生患者满意度。
背景:尽管有宝贵的国家数据,但英国急诊科(ED)就诊人数持续上升的原因仍然难以捉摸。背景:英格兰所有的急诊室和普通诊所。问:急诊科上座率的上升是否与全科病人的满意度有关,即如果病人无法方便地预约全科医生,那么他们是否会到当地的急诊科进行诊断、治疗和护理?方法:从国家数据仓库中提取GP患者满意度和ED出诊数据,并将其分为两组:(i)英格兰临床调试组(CCG)区域和(ii)伦敦CCG子集。将伦敦ccg的数据与伦敦以外的ccg进行比较。结果:非伦敦ccg的急诊科就诊率与全科医生患者满意度数据密切相关,例如,如果患者表示他们很难在全科就诊时获得方便的预约,那么当地急诊科就诊率会增加。当其他全科医生感知数据被探索时,关联被重复,例如,如果患者对全科医生和执业护士满意,那么他们就不太可能去当地的急诊室。然而,尽管对伦敦全科医生服务的满意度较低,但在伦敦CCG子集中没有发现这些关联。讨论和结论:尽管我们的研究对急诊科就诊率产生了有价值的见解,但伦敦全科患者和急诊科就诊率数据没有显示出伦敦以外地区发现的相同关联的原因值得进一步研究。将病人从急诊科转到初级保健服务可能并不像许多人想的那样直截了当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书