Face and content validity of the virtual reality simulator 'ScanTrainer®'.

Q2 Medicine
Gynecological Surgery Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-12 DOI:10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6
Amal Alsalamah, Rudi Campo, Vasilios Tanos, Gregoris Grimbizis, Yves Van Belle, Kerenza Hood, Neil Pugh, Nazar Amso
{"title":"Face and content validity of the virtual reality simulator 'ScanTrainer®'.","authors":"Amal Alsalamah,&nbsp;Rudi Campo,&nbsp;Vasilios Tanos,&nbsp;Gregoris Grimbizis,&nbsp;Yves Van Belle,&nbsp;Kerenza Hood,&nbsp;Neil Pugh,&nbsp;Nazar Amso","doi":"10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasonography is a first-line imaging in the investigation of women's irregular bleeding and other gynaecological pathologies, e.g. ovarian cysts and early pregnancy problems. However, teaching ultrasound, especially transvaginal scanning, remains a challenge for health professionals. New technology such as simulation may potentially facilitate and expedite the process of learning ultrasound. Simulation may prove to be realistic, very close to real patient scanning experience for the sonographer and objectively able to assist the development of basic skills such as image manipulation, hand-eye coordination and examination technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the face and content validity of a virtual reality simulator (ScanTrainer®, MedaPhor plc, Cardiff, Wales, UK) as reflective of real transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) scanning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A questionnaire with 14 simulator-related statements was distributed to a number of participants with differing levels of sonography experience in order to determine the level of agreement between the use of the simulator in training and real practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 36 participants: novices (<i>n</i> = 25) and experts (<i>n</i> = 11) who rated the simulator. Median scores of face validity statements between experts and non-experts using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings ranged between 7.5 and 9.0 (<i>p</i> > 0.05) indicated a high level of agreement. Experts' median scores of content validity statements ranged from 8.4 to 9.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings confirm that the simulator has the feel and look of real-time scanning with high face validity. Similarly, its tutorial structures and learning steps confirm the content validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46311,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background: Ultrasonography is a first-line imaging in the investigation of women's irregular bleeding and other gynaecological pathologies, e.g. ovarian cysts and early pregnancy problems. However, teaching ultrasound, especially transvaginal scanning, remains a challenge for health professionals. New technology such as simulation may potentially facilitate and expedite the process of learning ultrasound. Simulation may prove to be realistic, very close to real patient scanning experience for the sonographer and objectively able to assist the development of basic skills such as image manipulation, hand-eye coordination and examination technique.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the face and content validity of a virtual reality simulator (ScanTrainer®, MedaPhor plc, Cardiff, Wales, UK) as reflective of real transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) scanning.

Method: A questionnaire with 14 simulator-related statements was distributed to a number of participants with differing levels of sonography experience in order to determine the level of agreement between the use of the simulator in training and real practice.

Results: There were 36 participants: novices (n = 25) and experts (n = 11) who rated the simulator. Median scores of face validity statements between experts and non-experts using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings ranged between 7.5 and 9.0 (p > 0.05) indicated a high level of agreement. Experts' median scores of content validity statements ranged from 8.4 to 9.0.

Conclusions: The findings confirm that the simulator has the feel and look of real-time scanning with high face validity. Similarly, its tutorial structures and learning steps confirm the content validity.

虚拟现实模拟器“ScanTrainer®”的人脸和内容有效性。
背景:超声检查是调查女性不规则出血和其他妇科疾病(如卵巢囊肿和早孕问题)的一线影像学检查。然而,超声教学,特别是经阴道扫描,仍然是卫生专业人员的挑战。模拟等新技术可能会促进和加快学习超声的过程。模拟可能被证明是真实的,非常接近真实的患者扫描经验的超声医师,客观上能够帮助基本技能的发展,如图像处理,手眼协调和检查技术。目的:本研究的目的是确定虚拟现实模拟器(ScanTrainer®,MedaPhor plc, Cardiff, Wales, UK)的面部和内容有效性,以反射真实的经阴道超声(TVUS)扫描。方法:将一份包含14个模拟器相关陈述的调查问卷分发给一些具有不同超声经验水平的参与者,以确定模拟器在培训中使用与实际操作之间的一致程度。结果:共36名参与者,其中新手(n = 25)和专家(n = 11)对模拟器进行评分。采用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,专家和非专家的面部效度陈述中位数得分在7.5 ~ 9.0之间(p > 0.05),表明高度一致。专家对内容效度陈述的中位数得分在8.4到9.0之间。结论:该模拟器具有实时扫描的感觉和外观,具有较高的人脸效度。同样,它的教程结构和学习步骤也证实了内容的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: "Gynecological Surgery", founded in 2004, is the first and premier peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to all aspects of research, development, and training in gynecological surgery. This field is rapidly changing in response to new developments and innovations in endoscopy, robotics, imaging and other interventional procedures. Gynecological surgery is also expanding and now encompasses all surgical interventions pertaining to women health, including oncology, urogynecology and fetal surgery. The Journal publishes Original Research, Reviews, Evidence-based Viewpoints on clinical protocols and procedures, Editorials, Perspectives, Communications and Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信