Assessment of drug therapy problems among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya.

Gynecologic oncology research and practice Pub Date : 2017-10-18 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40661-017-0054-9
Amsalu Degu, Peter Njogu, Irene Weru, Peter Karimi
{"title":"Assessment of drug therapy problems among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya.","authors":"Amsalu Degu,&nbsp;Peter Njogu,&nbsp;Irene Weru,&nbsp;Peter Karimi","doi":"10.1186/s40661-017-0054-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cervical cancer is preventable, it is still the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the world. Further, it is estimated that around 5-10% of hospital admissions are due to drug related problems (DRPs), of which 50% are avoidable. In cancer therapy, there is an immense potential for DRPs due to the high toxicity of most chemotherapeutic regimens. Hence, this study sought to assess DRPs among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at the oncology units of KNH. A total of 81 study participants were recruited through simple random sampling. Data were collected from medical records and interviewing patients. The appropriateness of medical therapy was evaluated by comparing with National Compressive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology practice guideline of cervical cancer treatment protocol. The degree of adherence was determined using eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale. The likelihood of drug interaction was assessed using Medscape, Micromedex and Epocrates drug interaction checkers. The data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analysed using statistical software STATA version 13.0. Descriptive statistics such as mean, percent and frequency were used to summarise patients' characteristics. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to investigate the potential predictors of DRPs.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 215 DRPs were identified from 76 patients, translating to a prevalence of 93.8% and a mean of 2.65 ± 1.22 DRPs. The predominant proportion of DRPs (48.2%) was identified in patients who had been treated with chemoradiation regimens. Adverse drug reactions 56(69.1%) and drug interactions 38(46.9%) were the most prevalent DRPs. Majority (67.9%) of the study population were adherent to their treatment regimens. Forgetfulness 18(69.2%), expensive medications 4(15.4%) and side effects of medications 4(15.4%) were the main reasons for medication non-adherence. Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer were 15.4 times (AOR = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.3-185.87, <i>p</i> = 0.031) more likely to have DRPs as compared to patients with early stage disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and need of additional drug therapy were the most common DRPs identified among cervical cancer patients. Advanced stage cervical cancer was the only predictor of DRPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":91487,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40661-017-0054-9","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40661-017-0054-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background: Although cervical cancer is preventable, it is still the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the world. Further, it is estimated that around 5-10% of hospital admissions are due to drug related problems (DRPs), of which 50% are avoidable. In cancer therapy, there is an immense potential for DRPs due to the high toxicity of most chemotherapeutic regimens. Hence, this study sought to assess DRPs among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the oncology units of KNH. A total of 81 study participants were recruited through simple random sampling. Data were collected from medical records and interviewing patients. The appropriateness of medical therapy was evaluated by comparing with National Compressive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology practice guideline of cervical cancer treatment protocol. The degree of adherence was determined using eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale. The likelihood of drug interaction was assessed using Medscape, Micromedex and Epocrates drug interaction checkers. The data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analysed using statistical software STATA version 13.0. Descriptive statistics such as mean, percent and frequency were used to summarise patients' characteristics. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to investigate the potential predictors of DRPs.

Result: A total of 215 DRPs were identified from 76 patients, translating to a prevalence of 93.8% and a mean of 2.65 ± 1.22 DRPs. The predominant proportion of DRPs (48.2%) was identified in patients who had been treated with chemoradiation regimens. Adverse drug reactions 56(69.1%) and drug interactions 38(46.9%) were the most prevalent DRPs. Majority (67.9%) of the study population were adherent to their treatment regimens. Forgetfulness 18(69.2%), expensive medications 4(15.4%) and side effects of medications 4(15.4%) were the main reasons for medication non-adherence. Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer were 15.4 times (AOR = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.3-185.87, p = 0.031) more likely to have DRPs as compared to patients with early stage disease.

Conclusion: Adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and need of additional drug therapy were the most common DRPs identified among cervical cancer patients. Advanced stage cervical cancer was the only predictor of DRPs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肯尼亚肯雅塔国家医院宫颈癌患者药物治疗问题的评估。
背景:虽然子宫颈癌是可以预防的,但它仍然是世界上妇女癌症死亡的第二大原因。此外,据估计,约有5-10%的住院是由于与药物有关的问题(DRPs),其中50%是可以避免的。在癌症治疗中,由于大多数化疗方案的高毒性,DRPs具有巨大的潜力。因此,本研究试图评估肯雅塔国家医院(KNH)宫颈癌患者的DRPs。方法:在KNH肿瘤科进行横断面研究。通过简单随机抽样,共招募了81名研究参与者。数据收集自医疗记录和患者访谈。通过与国家肿瘤压缩网络和欧洲肿瘤医学学会宫颈癌治疗方案实践指南进行比较,评价药物治疗的适宜性。采用8项Morisky药物依从性量表测定依从程度。采用Medscape、Micromedex和Epocrates药物相互作用检查仪评估药物相互作用的可能性。数据在Microsoft Excel中输入,并使用统计软件STATA version 13.0进行分析。描述性统计如平均值、百分比和频率用于总结患者的特征。采用单变量和多变量二元logistic回归研究DRPs的潜在预测因素。结果:76例患者共检出215例DRPs,患病率为93.8%,平均2.65±1.22例DRPs。在接受过放化疗的患者中,DRPs的主要比例(48.2%)被确定。药物不良反应56例(69.1%)和药物相互作用38例(46.9%)是最常见的DRPs。大多数(67.9%)的研究人群坚持他们的治疗方案。健忘18例(69.2%)、药物价格昂贵4例(15.4%)和药物副作用4例(15.4%)是导致不遵医服药的主要原因。晚期宫颈癌患者发生DRPs的可能性是早期患者的15.4倍(AOR = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.3 ~ 185.87, p = 0.031)。结论:药物不良反应、药物相互作用和需要额外药物治疗是宫颈癌患者最常见的drp。晚期宫颈癌是DRPs的唯一预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信