The Use of the Clinical Ethnographic Narrative Interview to Understand and Support Help Seeking After Gender-Based Violence.

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Denise M Saint Arnault
{"title":"The Use of the Clinical Ethnographic Narrative Interview to Understand and Support Help Seeking After Gender-Based Violence.","authors":"Denise M Saint Arnault","doi":"10.4473/TPM24.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender-based violence (GBV), characterized by the abduction or rape of women and girls to humiliate, intimidate, and traumatize them and their communities, is a profoundly disturbing tactic in international conflict. Long after armed conflict has ended, survivors continue to experience physical injuries, psychological trauma, and social and cultural stigma. Guilt, shame, and continued interpersonal violence can become a normalized part of daily life, significantly challenging the road to healing and recovery. Research about self-disclosure and narrative after GBV has shown that help seeking rates are shockingly low, with estimates ranging from 4-27%. From a feminist and a humanistic perspective, studying trauma history and related help seeking is delicate work that must use interview processes that ensure the survivor can tell her story without revictimization, while also aiming to restore personal mastery, empowerment, and self-understanding. Based on theories about benefits and challenges of the narrative after GBV and trauma, we propose that the Clinical Ethnographic Narrative Interview (CENI) allows researchers and practitioners a safe container to examine the complex interplay between suffering, culture, and help seeking. Using this interview, the interviewer and the participant work as partners to define, compare, and contrast the socio-cultural barriers and facilitators of help seeking. This paper explains the narrative theory and the challenges and benefits of the narrative approach after trauma. Then we provide support for the use of the CENI for an understanding of the help seeking process and facilitating a health-promoting narrative interview for survivors. We then address implications for research, practice, and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46266,"journal":{"name":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","volume":"24 3","pages":"423-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4473/TPM24.3.8","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM24.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Gender-based violence (GBV), characterized by the abduction or rape of women and girls to humiliate, intimidate, and traumatize them and their communities, is a profoundly disturbing tactic in international conflict. Long after armed conflict has ended, survivors continue to experience physical injuries, psychological trauma, and social and cultural stigma. Guilt, shame, and continued interpersonal violence can become a normalized part of daily life, significantly challenging the road to healing and recovery. Research about self-disclosure and narrative after GBV has shown that help seeking rates are shockingly low, with estimates ranging from 4-27%. From a feminist and a humanistic perspective, studying trauma history and related help seeking is delicate work that must use interview processes that ensure the survivor can tell her story without revictimization, while also aiming to restore personal mastery, empowerment, and self-understanding. Based on theories about benefits and challenges of the narrative after GBV and trauma, we propose that the Clinical Ethnographic Narrative Interview (CENI) allows researchers and practitioners a safe container to examine the complex interplay between suffering, culture, and help seeking. Using this interview, the interviewer and the participant work as partners to define, compare, and contrast the socio-cultural barriers and facilitators of help seeking. This paper explains the narrative theory and the challenges and benefits of the narrative approach after trauma. Then we provide support for the use of the CENI for an understanding of the help seeking process and facilitating a health-promoting narrative interview for survivors. We then address implications for research, practice, and policy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用临床人种志叙事访谈来了解和支持性别暴力后的求助。
基于性别的暴力(GBV)的特点是绑架或强奸妇女和女孩,以羞辱、恐吓和伤害她们及其社区,是国际冲突中令人深感不安的策略。在武装冲突结束很久之后,幸存者继续遭受身体伤害、心理创伤以及社会和文化耻辱。内疚、羞耻和持续的人际暴力可以成为日常生活中常态化的一部分,极大地挑战了治愈和恢复的道路。关于性别暴力后的自我表露和叙述的研究表明,寻求帮助的比例低得惊人,估计在4-27%之间。从女权主义和人文主义的角度来看,研究创伤历史和相关的寻求帮助是一项微妙的工作,必须使用访谈过程,确保幸存者能够在不再次受害的情况下讲述自己的故事,同时也旨在恢复个人控制、赋权和自我理解。基于关于性别暴力和创伤后叙事的益处和挑战的理论,我们提出临床民族志叙事访谈(CENI)为研究人员和从业者提供了一个安全的容器来研究痛苦、文化和寻求帮助之间复杂的相互作用。通过这次访谈,访谈者和参与者作为合作伙伴来定义、比较和对比社会文化障碍和寻求帮助的促进因素。本文阐述了创伤后叙事的理论以及创伤后叙事的挑战和益处。然后,我们为使用CENI来理解寻求帮助的过程提供支持,并为幸存者提供促进健康的叙述性访谈。然后,我们将讨论对研究、实践和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信