Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Christopher R Browning, Catherine A Calder, Lauren J Krivo, Anna L Smith, Bethany Boettner
{"title":"Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?","authors":"Christopher R Browning, Catherine A Calder, Lauren J Krivo, Anna L Smith, Bethany Boettner","doi":"10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents' non-home activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p<sub>2</sub> (network) models, we analyze pairs of households located in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.</p>","PeriodicalId":51709,"journal":{"name":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640327/pdf/nihms885321.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents' non-home activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households located in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

城市社区活动空间的社会经济隔离:共享住所是否意味着共享作息时间?
在黑白隔离缓慢下降的同时,按收入和教育程度划分的居住隔离也在加剧。城市社区居民非家庭活动空间的隔离问题尚未得到探讨。居住在同一社区的人们的日常生活有多融合?与教育程度或收入相似的人相比,社会经济背景不同但住得近的人是否不太可能共享日常活动场所?这些模式是否因社会经济连续体或邻里结构而异?分析利用了洛杉矶家庭和邻里调查的独特数据,这些数据可以确定居民从事日常活动的地点。利用多层次 p2(网络)模型,我们分析了位于同一社区的成对家庭,并研究了三个社会经济地位水平的配对组合是否在同一地点进行日常活动,以及在日常活动的共同地点进行的邻里社会经济相似性是否取决于邻里社会经济不平等和信任水平。结果表明,平均而言,社会经济地位的提高会降低与任何社会经济地位群体共享活动地点的可能性。这种模式在社会经济不平等程度较高的社区最为明显。邻里信任在社会经济地位对日常活动分类程度的不平等影响中占了不小的比例。因此,鲜明、明显的邻里层面的社会经济不平等可能会导致不信任对跨阶层分享日常活动的意愿产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信